Efficacy and safety of cAMP signalling-biased GLP-1 analogue ecnoglutide monotherapy versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (EECOH-1): a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

D Dalong Zhu W Weimin Wang (MAX IV Laboratory, Fotongatan 2, Lund, SE-22484, Sweden) G Guoyu Tong J Jianhua Ma B Binhong Wen X Xin Zheng (PGI 7, Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany.) B Bimin Shi S Shuguang Pang K Kun Wang (Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Science, State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Materials Chemistry and Applications, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering) X Xiaoxia Shi X Xianghua Zhang L Liujun Fu Y Yang Liu Y Yibing Lu D Debin Huang C Chengxia Jiang T Tianrong Pan H Haibo Xue (Fujian University of Technology) J Jie Han (Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Green & Functional Materials and Environmental Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Materials) H Hongcheng Ding S Shaohui Bing F Feifei Jiang Q Qing Zheng M Ming Yang L Lei Guan X Xingquan Liu J Jing Ning Y Yue Bu M Mengying Guo L Liu Yang W Wanjun Guo Y Yao Li S Susan Xu H Hai Pan

Abstract

Abstract Ecnoglutide is a cAMP-biased GLP-1 analogue developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. We conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ecnoglutide in adults with T2DM inadequately controlled with diet and exercise alone or with a single oral hypoglycaemic agent. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA 1c ) from baseline at week 24. Between 29 December 2022 and 12 June 2024, 211 participants from 32 medical centres in China were randomised (2:2:1:1) to receive double-blind, once-weekly ecnoglutide (0.6 mg [n = 69] or 1.2 mg [n = 71]) or volume-matched placebo (0.6 mg [n = 36] or 1.2 mg [n = 35]) for 24 weeks. The randomisation, stratified by baseline HbA 1c (≤8.5% or >8.5%), was conducted via an interactive web response system. Ecnoglutide and placebo were identical in appearance to achieve masking. The trial was completed. All randomised participants received ≥1 dose of the assigned treatment and thus were included for analyses. At week 24, the least squares mean changes from baseline in HbA 1c were −1.96% (95% CI −2.18 to −1.73) with ecnoglutide 0.6 mg and −2.43% (95% CI −2.65 to −2.20) with ecnoglutide 1.2 mg versus −0.87% (−1.09 to −0.65) with placebo. The estimated treatment differences versus placebo were −1.09% (95% CI −1.40 to −0.77; p = 0.0003) with ecnoglutide 0.6 mg and −1.56% (95% CI −1.87 to −1.24; p < 0.0001) with ecnoglutide 1.2 mg. Ecnoglutide represents a potential monotherapy option for T2DM. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov with the registration number NCT05680155.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 17, Issue 1
Published January 07, 2026
ISSN 2041-1723
Publisher Nature Portfolio

Journal Info

Nature Communications

Nature Portfolio

ISSN: 2041-1723 Open Access Life Sciences

Authors (34)

D

Dalong Zhu

W

Weimin Wang

MAX IV Laboratory, Fotongatan 2, Lund, SE-22484, Sweden

G

Guoyu Tong

J

Jianhua Ma

B

Binhong Wen

X

Xin Zheng

PGI 7, Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany.

B

Bimin Shi

S

Shuguang Pang

K

Kun Wang

Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Science, State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Materials Chemistry and Applications, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering

X

Xiaoxia Shi

X

Xianghua Zhang

L

Liujun Fu

Y

Yang Liu

Y

Yibing Lu

D

Debin Huang

C

Chengxia Jiang

T

Tianrong Pan

H

Haibo Xue

Fujian University of Technology

J

Jie Han

Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Green & Functional Materials and Environmental Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Materials

H

Hongcheng Ding

S

Shaohui Bing

F

Feifei Jiang

Q

Qing Zheng

M

Ming Yang

L

Lei Guan

X

Xingquan Liu

J

Jing Ning

Y

Yue Bu

M

Mengying Guo

L

Liu Yang

W

Wanjun Guo

Y

Yao Li

S

Susan Xu

H

Hai Pan