Efficacy and safety of asciminib (ASC) in patients (pts) with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) after 1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI): Interim analysis (IA) of the phase 2 ASC2ESCALATE trial.

D David Jacob Andorsky (Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Boulder, CO) M Marlise R. Luskin (20Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) S Srinivas Kiran Tantravahi (Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT) K Koji Sasaki (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) J James Dugan (12Novant Health Cancer Institute, Winston-Salem, United States) C Celeste A. Bremer (Virginia Oncology Associates, Virginia Beach, VA) V Vivian G. Oehler (Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA) J Joshua F. Zeidner (1Division of Hematology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC) M Moshe Yair Levy (Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX) C Camille N. Abboud (1Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) E Ehab L. Atallah (Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI) P Paul B. Koller (City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA) B Bonnie Kiner-Strachan (4New York University Langone Hospital Long Island, Mineola, United States) H Habte Aragaw Yimer (Texas Onc Tyler, Tyler, TX) D Daisy Yang (4Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, United States) J J. Randy Sabo (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ) B Bridget Cooper (16Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, United States) D Dheeraj Gianchandani (19Novartis Healthcare Private Limited, Hyderabad, India) J Jorge E. Cortes (1Department of Medicine, Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, GA) M Michael J. Mauro

Abstract

6516 Background: ASC2ESCALATE (NCT05384587) is the first prospective trial of ASC in CML-CP after 1 TKI (2L) with dose escalation for pts with suboptimal response; ASC is also being assessed in a separate newly diagnosed (1L) cohort. A previous IA of the 2L cohort reported ASC’s safety (n=71) and wk 24 efficacy (n=28; BCR::ABL1 IS ≤1%, 85.7%; major molecular response [MMR], 42.9%). We report updated safety (n=101) and wk 24 efficacy (n=63) results. Methods: ASC2ESCALATE is a phase 2, single-arm, open-label US study of ASC in adults with 1L or 2L CML-CP without the T315I mutation. In the 2L cohort, eligible pts had discontinued their prior TKI due to warning or failure per ELN2020 or intolerance with BCR::ABL1 IS >0.1% at screening. Pts received ASC 80 mg once daily (QD). If BCR::ABL1 IS >1% at wk 24, dose was increased to 200 mg QD. If BCR::ABL1 IS >0.1% at wk 48, dose was increased from 80 to 200 mg QD or from 200 mg QD to 200 mg twice daily, or pts could be taken off study. If pts had any grade 3/4 or persistent grade 2 toxicity refractory to optimal management, they were ineligible for dose escalation at wk 24 and/or 48 and continued the same dose. Results: This IA included all 101 pts enrolled with 2L CML-CP; all pts had received ≥1 ASC dose by the cutoff (Nov 15, 2024). Prior treatment (Tx) included dasatinib (44.6%), imatinib (42.6%), nilotinib (9.9%), or bosutinib (5.0%); 66.3% of pts had received prior Tx for ≥12 mo. Pts discontinued prior Tx due to lack of efficacy (56.4%) or intolerance (43.6%). By the cutoff, 92 pts (91.1%) remained on ASC; 9 pts (8.9%) discontinued ASC, mostly due to adverse events (AEs; n=4) and pt decision (n=3). Median duration of ASC exposure was 26.1 (range, 6-100) wk. Pts evaluable for all efficacy analyses completed assessments for the respective timepoint or discontinued earlier (wk 4, n=94; wk 12, n=86; wk 24, n= 63). At wk 4, 12, and 24, 46.8%, 84.9%, and 82.5% pts, respectively, had BCR::ABL1 IS ≤1%. Deeper responses were also achieved at wk 12 (MMR, 39.5%; MR 4 , 11.6%; MR 4.5 , 2.3%) and 24 (MMR, 44.4%; MR 4 , 25.4%; MR 4.5 , 9.5%). Seven pts had dose escalation from 80 to 200 mg QD per their response level at wk 24 (n=3) and 48 (n=4). All-grade AEs ≥20% were headache (22.8%) and nausea (20.8%). Grade ≥3 AEs ≥5% were hypertension (8.9 %), thrombocytopenia (6.9%), and neutropenia (5.9%). AEs led to dose adjustment/interruption in 27 pts (26.7%). AEs led to discontinuation in 4 pts; 1 of these AEs occurred >30 d after last ASC dose. No arterial-occlusive events or on-Tx deaths occurred. Conclusions: 2L ASC demonstrated high molecular response rates at wk 24 and safety consistent with previously established ASC data across Tx lines; no new or worsening safety signals arose. ASC was tolerable with few AEs leading to discontinuation. These IA results support ASC as a Tx option in 2L CML-CP. The impact of dose escalation continues to be explored. Clinical trial information: NCT05384587 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 6516-6516
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

D

David Jacob Andorsky

Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Boulder, CO

M

Marlise R. Luskin

20Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

S

Srinivas Kiran Tantravahi

Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

K

Koji Sasaki

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J

James Dugan

12Novant Health Cancer Institute, Winston-Salem, United States

C

Celeste A. Bremer

Virginia Oncology Associates, Virginia Beach, VA

V

Vivian G. Oehler

Translational Science and Therapeutics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA

J

Joshua F. Zeidner

1Division of Hematology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

M

Moshe Yair Levy

Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX

C

Camille N. Abboud

1Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

E

Ehab L. Atallah

Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

P

Paul B. Koller

City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA

B

Bonnie Kiner-Strachan

4New York University Langone Hospital Long Island, Mineola, United States

H

Habte Aragaw Yimer

Texas Onc Tyler, Tyler, TX

D

Daisy Yang

4Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, United States

J

J. Randy Sabo

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ

B

Bridget Cooper

16Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, United States

D

Dheeraj Gianchandani

19Novartis Healthcare Private Limited, Hyderabad, India

J

Jorge E. Cortes

1Department of Medicine, Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, GA

M

Michael J. Mauro