Effect of FDG-PET–based bone marrow assessment on prognostic accuracy compared to conventional histologic evaluation in patients with follicular lymphoma: A subanalysis of the FIL FOLL12 trial.

S Stefano Luminari (Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy) G Giovanni Manfredi Assanto (2AUO Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Palliative and Domiciliar Care Unit, Rome, Italy) L Luca Guerra (29Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy) L Luigi Marcheselli (Fondazione Italiana Linfomi Onlus, Modena, Italy) E Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari (Medipass Ergéa Group, Unità di Medicina Nucleare Fondazione Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy) R Rexhep Durmo E Elisa Genuardi (University of Turin, Turin, Italy) M Maria Elena Nizzoli (1Azienda USL IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy) C Carola Boccomini (Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy) B Benedetta Puccini (10Department of Haematology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy) A Alessandro Pulsoni (Sapienza University of Rome, Rome) V Vincenzo Pavone (28Cardinal Panico Hospital, Tricase, Italy) A Annalisa Arcari (11Hematology Unit, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, Piacenza, Italy) A Annarita Conconi (10Azienda sanitaria locale, Ematologia, Ospedale degli Infermi, Biella, Italy) M Marco Ladetto (1University of Eastern Piedmont, Department of Translational Medicine, Novara, Italy) S Sara Galimberti (14Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy) I Ilaria Del Giudice (Sapienza University of Rome, Rome) M Massimo Federico (10CHIMOMO Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy) S Stephane Chauvie (2Santa Croce e Carle General Hospital, Cuneo, Italy) S Simone Ferrero (University of Turin, Turin, Italy)

Abstract

7074 Background: Bone marrow biopsy (BMB) is an invasive staging procedure for follicular lymphoma (FL) and its results are needed to calculate FLIPI2 and PRIMA-PI scores. Beyond conventional biopsy bone marrow can also be assessed through FDG-PET bone staging (PETb). We report preliminary data on a comparison of BMB and PETb in assessing BM involvement among FL patients enrolled in the FIL-FOLL12 trial. Methods: Untreated stage II–IV FL patients requiring therapy were included. Patients were balanced according to treatment received and arm. BMBs were assessed by morphology and immunohistochemistry. PET/CT scans were reviewed by two expert nuclear medicine physicians. Pathological bone uptake (PETb+) was defined as mono- or multifocal, or diffuse FDG uptake in bone segments higher than liver activity (SUVmax). Results: This analysis included 179 patients; no significant differences in disease characteristics were observed between the revised cohort and the remaining patients enrolled in the FOLL12 trial. High-risk FLIPI2 was noted in 35.4%, and β2-microglobulin was increased in 53% of patients. BMB involvement was present in 58.5% (median infiltration 30%, range 0.5–95%). PETb was positive in 38 cases (21%), including 14% with focal or multifocal involvement and 7% with diffuse increased uptake. Concordant results between BMB and PETb were observed in 53.6%: among 103 BMB+ patients, 30 were PETb+ (29%). PETb identified BM involvement in 8 cases missed by BMB. While BMB+ was not associated with a different risk of PFS compared to BMB-, we observed a significant impact of PETb+ on PFS: PETb+ had 41% 5-year PFS (CI 25-72, p=0.003), while BMB+/PETb- showed 74% (CI 62-83, p=0.27) and BMB-/PETb- 66%(CI 52-72, reference).We then calculated FLIPI2 and PRIMA-PI using either conventional BMB or PETb to define BM involvement. The agreement between BMB and PETb scores was 87% for FLIPI2 and 67% for PRIMA-PI and the main disagreement was due to reallocation to lower risk groups; FLIPI2 0-2 patients raised from 65% to 74.3% according to FLIPI2-PET. FLIPI2 was confirmed prognostic for PFS and its c-Harrel increased from 0.582 to 0.602 when BMB was substituted with PETb (Table 1), with a 52% (CI 39-64) 5-Year PFS for conventional high risk FLIPI2 shifting to 41% (CI26-56) for high risk FLIPI2-PET. Conclusions: Although BMB detects marrow involvement in most patients, this does not uniformly translate into adverse prognosis. PETb, while less sensitive, identifies metabolically active and prognostically relevant bone disease. A FDG-PET-based assessment of bone involvement could refine risk stratification in FL and spare BMB in most patients Score HR for High risk CI c-Harrell FLIPI2 2.03 1.25-3.31 0.582 FLIPI2-PET 2.58 1.57-4.26 0.602 PRIMA-PI 1.23 0.67-2.23 0.537 PRIMA-PI-PET 1.47 0.85-2.54 0.550

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 7074-7074
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

S

Stefano Luminari

Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy

G

Giovanni Manfredi Assanto

2AUO Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Palliative and Domiciliar Care Unit, Rome, Italy

L

Luca Guerra

29Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy

L

Luigi Marcheselli

Fondazione Italiana Linfomi Onlus, Modena, Italy

E

Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari

Medipass Ergéa Group, Unità di Medicina Nucleare Fondazione Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy

R

Rexhep Durmo

E

Elisa Genuardi

University of Turin, Turin, Italy

M

Maria Elena Nizzoli

1Azienda USL IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy

C

Carola Boccomini

Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy

B

Benedetta Puccini

10Department of Haematology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

A

Alessandro Pulsoni

Sapienza University of Rome, Rome

V

Vincenzo Pavone

28Cardinal Panico Hospital, Tricase, Italy

A

Annalisa Arcari

11Hematology Unit, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, Piacenza, Italy

A

Annarita Conconi

10Azienda sanitaria locale, Ematologia, Ospedale degli Infermi, Biella, Italy

M

Marco Ladetto

1University of Eastern Piedmont, Department of Translational Medicine, Novara, Italy

S

Sara Galimberti

14Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

I

Ilaria Del Giudice

Sapienza University of Rome, Rome

M

Massimo Federico

10CHIMOMO Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

S

Stephane Chauvie

2Santa Croce e Carle General Hospital, Cuneo, Italy

S

Simone Ferrero

University of Turin, Turin, Italy