Economic modelling to inform pricing for LMICs of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced PD-L1-high non-small cell lung cancer.
Abstract
1518 Background: Lung cancer is the most common cancer and cause of cancer death, encompassing for 16.8% of all cancer-related deaths worldwide. Anti-PD(L)1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) as monotherapy currently represent the standard of care (SoC) for advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with high (≥50%) PD-L1 expression in high-income countries. Despite their efficacy, ICIs remain largely inaccessible in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with affordability being a significant barrier. Providing evidence on cost-effective (CE) price ranges for ICIs in LMICs is critical for global health policymakers to devise strategies to enhance access. Methods: A partitioned-survival model was used to estimate CE price targets for three ICIs (atezolizumab, cemiplimab, and pembrolizumab) as single agents compared to platinum-based combination chemotherapy (current SoC in several LMICs). Treatment duration was assumed of up to 35 cycles or until disease progression. Cost-effectiveness thresholds were set at 1, 2, and 3 times the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Case studies were modelled in two LMICs (India and South Africa – not all ICIs were registered in both countries) to determine the maximum price at which ICIs would be CE from the perspective of publicly-funded health systems. Primary efficacy data were sourced from phase III clinical trials (KEYNOTE-024, IMpower110, and EMPOWER-Lung 1), and country-specific data were collected through interviews with key technical stakeholders. Values were reported in USD for 2023. Results: The analysis determined that the maximum acquisition costs for ICIs to be cost-effective at 1-, 2-, and 3-times GDP per capita in India and South Africa, range from $14.20 to $648.00 per cycle per patient. Current reference prices would require discounts of up to 93.3% to meet the 3 GDP threshold. Dose-optimization strategies such as low-dose and vial sharing were identified as feasible and evidence-based approaches to achieve partial price reduction (sensitivity analysis will be provided). Conclusions: To make ICIs cost-effective in LMICs, significant discounts from current reference prices are needed. Similar price reductions (up 93%) have been achieved for other monoclonal antibodies, such as trastuzumab, in India and South Africa, also driven by the availability and uptake of quality-assured biosimilars. A comprehensive approach, combining accelerated biosimilar availability, also leveraging voluntary licensing and technology transfer, with dose and treatment-duration optimization strategies could help achieve target price levels and improve accessibility. Country WTP threshold (xGDP) Pembrolizumab Atezolizumab Cemiplimab India 1 $72.6 $74.2 $66.5 2 $199.7 $166.9 $181.5 3 $308.6 $259.6 $300.0 South Africa 1 $51.5 $53.1 $14.2 2 $349.9 $289.0 $314.7 3 $648.2 $525.0 $615.2
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (9)
Giulia Segafredo
Medicines Patent Pool, Genève, Switzerland
Dario Trapani
Manju Sengar
32Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
Paul Ruff
Esteban Burrone
Medicines Patent Pool, Geneva, Switzerland
Hannah Schirrmacher
Triangulate Health Ltd, Doncaster, United Kingdom
Konstantina Politopoulou
Triangulate Health Ltd, Doncaster, United Kingdom
Chrissy Bishop
Triangulate Health Ltd, Doncaster, United Kingdom
Federico Cairoli
Triangulate Health Ltd, Doncaster, United Kingdom