Early versus delayed oral feeding after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

M Muhammad Abbas O Owais Gul (United Health Services Hospitals, Johnson City, NY) F FNU Sawaira (5Peshawar Girls Medical College, Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan) M Muhammad Arsalan H Hassaan Qazi (Bannu Medical College, Bannu, Pakistan) M Muhammad Hasnain M Muhammad Yasir A Ahmed Khan Jadoon (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) W Wahab Zia (Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan)

Abstract

e16027 Background: Postoperative oral intake after esophagectomy has traditionally been delayed due to concerns about anastomotic leakage. Although Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways increasingly support early feeding, its safety remains debated. This study compared early versus delayed oral feeding following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched through October 2025 for randomized controlled trials evaluating early oral feeding (postoperative days 0–3) versus delayed feeding (postoperative day ≥5) after esophagectomy. Primary outcomes were anastomotic leakage and pneumonia. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, gastrointestinal recovery, length of hospital stay, healthcare costs, and quality of life. Pooled risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs), or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Review Manager 5.4. Results: Thirteen trials involving 1,468 patients were included. Early oral feeding was not associated with increased anastomotic leakage (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.55–1.45; I² = 0%) and showed consistent safety across surgical approaches and anastomotic sites. The incidence of pneumonia was significantly reduced (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47–0.92; p = 0.01). Early feeding accelerated gastrointestinal recovery, including earlier first bowel movement (MD: −0.50 days, p < 0.00001) and passage of flatus (MD: −0.61 days, p = 0.0006). Hospital stay was shortened (MD: −1.89 days, p = 0.002), with lower medical costs (SMD: −1.19, p = 0.009). Quality-of-life measures improved, including global health status, dysphagia, pain, and swallowing function. Conclusions: Early oral feeding after esophagectomy appears safe and beneficial, reducing pulmonary complications and enhancing postoperative recovery. Further high-quality multicenter trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (9)

M

Muhammad Abbas

O

Owais Gul

United Health Services Hospitals, Johnson City, NY

F

FNU Sawaira

5Peshawar Girls Medical College, Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan

M

Muhammad Arsalan

H

Hassaan Qazi

Bannu Medical College, Bannu, Pakistan

M

Muhammad Hasnain

M

Muhammad Yasir

A

Ahmed Khan Jadoon

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

W

Wahab Zia

Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan