Early results from the first-in-human phase 1 study of WEE1 inhibitor APR-1051 in patients with advanced solid tumors (ACESOT-1051).
Abstract
3107 Background: WEE1 tyrosine kinase regulates cell cycle checkpoints (G1-S, G2-M) and DNA damage responses. Inhibiting WEE1 can force premature mitotic entry and subsequent apoptosis. APR-1051 is a highly potent, orally bioavailable WEE1 inhibitor (WEE1i) with in vivo anti-proliferative activity. Low off-target inhibition of APR-1051 on PLK kinases (PLK1, PLK2, PLK3) differentiates it from other WEE1i’s and may confer improved safety. Methods: This open-label dose escalation (BOIN) and dose selection optimization study is evaluating APR-1051 using a once-daily (QD) regimen. The study is currently enrolling at 220 mg at three US sites (NCT06260514). Primary study objectives are to characterize the safety, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose/maximum administered dose, and recommended phase 2 dose of APR-1051. Secondary objectives include evaluating APR-1051 pharmacokinetic properties and preliminary efficacy (RECIST v1.1; PCWG3 criteria for mCRPC). Key inclusion criteria are age ≥ 18 years with advanced solid tumor and cancer-associated gene alterations, prior standard-of-care systemic treatment, and ECOG PS 0 or 1. Key exclusion criteria are prior WEE1i use, CNS metastases/unstable involvement, secondary malignancies requiring therapy, and concomitant moderate/strong inhibitors/inducers of CYP3A4/5, MDR1, or BCRP. Results: As of January 16, 2026, 22 patients (median age 62 years [range: 40–86]; have been enrolled up to the 220 mg dose level. Most (n=13, 59%) cases were colorectal cancers (colon [n=9, 41%], rectal [n=4, 18%]) followed by uterine (n=3, 14%), pancreatic (n=2, 9%), and breast, gastric, oropharyngeal, and soft tissue cancer (each n=1, 5%). The median prior lines of treatments was 3. Any grade adverse event (AE) was report in 21 (95%) patients. Treatment-related AEs were reported in 12 (55%) patients; 10 (45%) patients had non-serious gastrointestinal events. Twelve (55%) patients had 18 unique serious AEs, including one death on treatment unrelated to APR-1051 and one DLT of grade 3 elevated liver enzymes (AST, ALT) probably related to APR-1051 (n=1, 5%). Antitumor activity was observed in one (5%) patient with uterine serous carcinoma treated with APR-1051 150 mg who had an unconfirmed partial response—50% reduction in target lesion size (RECIST v1.1) and > 90% reduction in CA-125 tumor marker—at per protocol 8-week assessment. Five (23%) patients had stable disease: oropharyngeal cancer (APR-1051 70 mg [n=1, 5%]); colon, rectal, uterine cancer (100 mg [n=3, 14%]); colon cancer (150 mg [n=1, 5%]). A dose proportional increase in exposure was observed. Conclusions: In the ongoing trial, continuous, oral APR-1051 QD has a manageable safety profile with preliminary signals of antitumor activity in patients with pretreated advanced solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT06260514 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (8)
Shiraj Sen
NEXT Oncology Dallas, Dallas, TX
David Sommerhalder
NEXT Oncology, San Antonio, TX
Anthony W. Tolcher
NEXT Oncology, San Antonio, TX
Crystal Miller
Aprea Therapeutics, Doylestown, PA
David D. Stenehjem
College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN
Michael Carleton
Aprea Therapeutics, Doylestown, PA
Philippe Pultar
Aprea Therapeutics, Doylestown, PA
Timothy A. Yap