Early outcomes of the PLATO ACT5 randomised trial: Personalizing anal cancer radiotherapy dose.
Abstract
1 Background: The optimal dose of radiotherapy (RT) in advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is uncertain. Cure rates need to improve, but higher dose RT may result in significant morbidity. Methods: PLATO ACT5 is a seamless pilot/phII/phIII prospective, multi-centre, 3-arm RCT investigating dose-escalated intensity modulated radiotherapy (de-IMRT) with chemotherapy in patients (pts) with T3/4N0 and TanyN+ ASCC. Primary outcome is 3-year locoregional failure (LRF). We report planned 6-month endpoints: acute toxicity (CTCAEv5), treatment compliance, radiological and clinical complete response rates (cCR) and patient reported outcomes (PROs; EORTC-QLQ C30 and ANL27). Pts were randomised 1:1:1 in 28 fractions to standard dose IMRT (sd-IMRT; 53.2Gy), de1-IMRT (58.8Gy) or de2-IMRT (61.6 Gy) with concurrent mitomycin 12mg/m2 day (D) 1 & capecitabine (CAP) 825mg/m2 BD on RT days or 5FU 1000mg/m2 D1-4 & D29-32. 459 pts including 10% drop out were required to compare each experimental arm against sd-IMRT for 3-year LRF-free survival. Results: 463 pts were recruited from 34 UK sites (sd-IMRT n=154; de1-IMRT n=155; de2-IMRT n=154) between Feb 2017 – Aug 2023. 82% received CAP RT and 18% received 5FU RT. Pts characteristics were balanced across 3 arms: Overall median age was 62 years (range 29-81); 73% ECOG 0; 73% female; 30% T4; 45%/18%/21% N1/2/3 respectively; 21% required pre-RT stoma; 1.5% HIV positive. ≥G3 acute toxicity was reported in 57% (sd-IMRT; n=90), 56% (de1-IMRT n=86) and 58, and at 6 mo 19 patients (5/5/9 respectively) reported ≥G3. 460 completed per protocol RT. RT interruptions: sd-IMRT n=40 (26.1%), de1-IMRT n=33 (21.4%), de2-IMRT n=39 (25.7%) of which 25% were due toxicity. 70 (36%) had CAP reduction/omission (sd-IMRT n=13/50; de1-IMRT n=12/47 de2-IMRT n=39/9 respectively); the majority were due to toxicity (46-58%). 6 mo cCR: (MRI TRG 1&2 with no visible T2 weighted pelvic lymph nodes) are: sd-IMRT =100 (65%); de1-IMRT =103 (67%); de2-IMRT= 101 (66%). For PROs, there was a similar large deterioration in pain, fatigue, bowel function, quality of life, physical, role and social function at the end of CRT across all arms which resolved to baseline by 6 months in all arms. Conclusions: Dose escalation has similar toxicity, but does not improve early outcomes. Further stage stratification and novel biology approaches for personalisation are needed. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN88455282.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Maria A. Hawkins
University College London, London, United Kingdom
Alexandra Gilbert
Richard Adams
Lindy Berkman
Leeds, United Kingdom
Joanne Copeland
Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU) Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, United Kingdom
Duncan C. Gilbert
MRC (Medical Research Council) Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London
Mark Harrison
Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
Robert Glynne-Jones
Mount Vernon Cancer Center, Middlesex, United Kingdom
Vicky Goh
School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
Chloe Gaul
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Andrew Renehan
The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
Rebecca Muirhead
Matthew Norris
Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Sheela Rao
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey, United Kingdom
Susan D. Richman
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Sharon Ruddock
CTRU, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Joanne Webster
Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU) Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, United Kingdom
Sarah R. Brown
Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
David Sebag-Montefiore