Dynamics of iodine geminate recombination in supercritical xenon solvent: Caging effect
Abstract
Understanding the dynamics of chemical reactions in solutions is vital, as their rates and kinetics are significantly affected by the solvent environment. Supercritical solvents offer extensive applications in chemical reactions by enabling the manipulation of the solution environment. In this study, we investigate the geminate recombination of iodine in a supercritical xenon solvent by using ReaxFF-based molecular dynamics simulations. Our findings reveal that the highest iodine recombination rate occurs near supercritical conditions, while lower-pressure conditions lead to reduced collision rates and unstable recombination, and higher-pressure conditions hinder iodine diffusion, resulting in a lower recombination rate. Our analysis shows that the xenon local density at the time of recombination is at least 2.5 times higher than the global density, confirming the presence of xenon clusters surrounding the Iodine atoms. This observation is further supported by coordination number analysis, which confirms an elevated xenon local density during recombination. In addition, the correlation between the total energy of xenon atoms within a cluster and recombined iodine atoms underscores the kinetic energy transfer process, validating the occurrence of geminate recombination. The excess kinetic energy from the recombining iodine atoms is transferred to the surrounding xenon atoms. Our examination of geminate recombination demonstrates that iodine atoms confined within xenon clusters—whether through manual insertion of atoms or the fast dissociation of an iodine molecule within xenon clusters—are more likely to recombine as primary geminate recombination. However, extending the iodine molecule dissociation time allows iodine atoms to diffuse out of the cluster, and the recombination to shift toward secondary geminate recombination.
Article Details
Journal Info
The Journal of Chemical Physics
American Institute of Physics
Authors (4)
M. Mirakhory
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University 1 , University Park, Pennsylvania 16802,
A. Majumdar
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University 2 , Stanford, California 94305,
M. Ihme
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University 2 , Stanford, California 94305,
A. C. T. van Duin
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University 1 , University Park, Pennsylvania 16802,