Durvalumab (D) in combination with BCG induction and maintenance (I + M) therapy for BCG-naive, high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC): 5-year overall survival (OS) analysis and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from POTOMAC.
Abstract
4624 Background: In the Phase 3 POTOMAC study (NCT03528694), 1 year of D in combination with BCG (I + M) resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in disease-free survival vs BCG (I + M) alone, with a manageable safety profile, in patients (pts) with BCG-naive, high-risk NMIBC. We report a planned updated 5-year OS analysis and PROs. Methods: Eligible pts were randomized 1:1:1 to D + BCG (I + M), D + BCG (I only), or BCG (I + M). Secondary endpoints included 5-year OS and PROs, evaluated every 8 weeks by EORTC QLQ-C30 and every 4 weeks by EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24 and PRO-CTCAE. Prespecified priority subscales were global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL), physical functioning, and fatigue for QLQ-C30; and urinary symptoms, intravesical treatment (tx) issues, future perspective/worries, and sexual functioning for QLQ-NMIBC24. Change from baseline (CFB; mixed model for repeated measures) was assessed; a ±10-point score was considered clinically meaningful. Results: At data cutoff Oct 3, 2025 (median follow-up 72 months), the OS HR was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.54–1.19) with a 5-year OS rate of 87.6% (95% CI, 83.5%–90.8%) for D + BCG (I + M) vs 86.3% (95% CI, 82.1%–89.6%) for BCG (I + M). Median OS was not reached in either arm. For PRO analyses (data cutoff Apr 3, 2025), QLQ-C30 and QLQ-NMIBC24 baseline compliance rates were ≥74% and ≥79%, respectively, with similar baseline scores between arms. Overall, both arms showed deterioration in QLQ-C30 adjusted mean CFB scores, with suggested clinically meaningful deterioration for fatigue with D + BCG (I + M); however, the difference between arms was small (Table). Overall QLQ-NMIBC24 adjusted mean CFB scores were numerically small and similar between arms (Table). PRO-CTCAE measures were similar between arms. Conclusions: Addition of 1 year of D to BCG (I + M) continued to show no detriment to OS at >5.5 years of follow-up and had no major impact on PROs for pts with BCG-naive high-risk NMIBC. Clinical trial information: NCT03528694 . Subscales D + BCG (I + M)Adjusted mean CFB (95% CI) a BCG (I + M)Adjusted mean CFB (95% CI) a Estimated difference of means (95% CI) QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL b −7.6 (–9.19, −6.07) −4.9 (–6.46, −3.41) −2.7 (–4.85, −0.54) Physical functioning b −5.5 (–6.76, −4.15) −2.8 (–4.11, −1.56) –2.6 (–4.43, –0.81) Fatigue c 10.1 (8.32, 11.90) 6.1 (4.37, 7.88) 4.0 (1.50, 6.46) QLQ-NMIBC24 Urinary symptoms c 1.7 (−0.06, 3.41) 0.4 (−1.27, 2.15) 1.2 (–1.19, 3.65) Intravesical tx issues c 1.5 (−0.38, 3.28) 2.7 (0.89, 4.50) −1.2 (−3.79, 1.29) Future perspective/worries c −5.5 (−7.54, −3.39) −3.2 (−5.29, −1.19) −2.2 (−5.11, 0.66) Sexual functioning b 2.2 (0.47, 3.91) 1.1 (–0.60, 2.80) 1.1 (−1.30, 3.48) a Higher scores indicate better health (GHS/functioning) or greater burden (symptoms). b Positive difference favors D + BCG (I + M). c Negative difference favors D + BCG (I + M).
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Maria de Santis
Neal D. Shore
START Carolinas/Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC
Hiroyuki Nishiyama
University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
Michal Krawczyński
Clinical Research Center Sp, Poznan, Poland
Artur Seyitkuliev
St. Petersburg Hospital of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Félix Guerrero-Ramos
Ruslan Zukov
20Krasnoyarsk Regional Oncology Dispensary, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
Takashi Kawahara
Lieven Goeman
Department of Development and Regeneration, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Thomas Powles
Department of Medical Oncology Barts Cancer Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK
Kilian Martin Gust
Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Susan Feyerabend
Studienpraxis Urologie, Medius Klinik Nürtingen, Nürtingen, Germany
Manish Patel
Girish S. Kulkarni
Cancer Clinical Research Unit (CCU), Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
Thierry Lebret
Department of Urology, Suresnes, France
Hans M. Westgeest
Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
Ana Quartilho
AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Aleksandra Dabrowska
Angie Marsh
AstraZeneca, Mississauga, ON, Canada
Joan Palou
Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain