Double-dose axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-Cel-2) as second-line therapy for high-risk relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/rLBCL): Interim results from a Phase 1b study
Abstract
Abstract Background Axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel) has improved outcomes in relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma(r/rLBCL); however, more than half of patients(pts) experience disease progression or death especially among pts with elevated lactate dehydrogenase(LDH). Axi-Cel-2, a second axi-cel infusion administered shortly after standard-of-care(SOC) axi-cel, aims to improve target to effector ratio and increase exposure to less-exhausted CAR T-cells(CAR-T). We report interim Phase 1b results examining the safety and efficacy of Axi-Cel-2(NCT05794958). Method Adults with r/rLBCL, elevated LDH, and second-line(2L) axi-cel eligibility are included. Bridging therapy(BT) with steroids and/or radiation is permitted. After lymphodepleting chemotherapy(LDC), all pts receive SOC axi-cel. Pts without grade(gr) ≥3 cytokine release syndrome(CRS) or immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity(ICANS) are eligible for Axi-Cel-2, administered 7–14 days after the SOC infusion, at 0.5×10⁶ CAR+ cells/kg(safety run-in) or 2×10⁶ CAR+ cells/kg(phase 1b). Single LDC is used for both infusions. Target enrollment is 20 pts receiving Axi-Cel-2. The primary endpoint is incidence of dose-limiting toxicity(DLT) with key secondary endpoint being 12-month(mo) progression-free survival(PFS). Results are referenced to SOC axi-cel infusion(day 0). Blood samples are collected over 28 days post SOC axi-cel to assess CAR-T kinetics and phenotype(Hamilton, Blood Adv 2024), as well as gene expression and clonal dynamics on days 7 and 17 in fold change(FC) using single-cell multi-omics(Good, Nat Med 2022). Molecular responses are assessed using PhasED-Seq(Kurtz, Nat Biotechnol 2021) to quantify pretreatment circulating tumor DNA(ctDNA) and minimal residual disease(MRD) while EPIC-Seq(Esfahani, Nat Biotechnol 2022) is used to evaluate CD19 antigen loss. Results As of July 15, 2025, 16 pts have been enrolled(15 evaluable). The median age was 61.5 years(range/r, 19–83), with 38% aged ≥65 years. Sixty-nine % of pts had refractory disease, and 56% had an IPI score ≥3. BT was administered in 81% of pts, and all received prophylactic steroids. Four pts were ineligible for Axi-Cel-2 due to gr ≥3 ICANS or active infection. Eleven pts received Axi-Cel-2(3 in the safety lead-in and 8 in the Phase 1b), and the analysis focuses on these pts. The median day of Axi-Cel-2 infusion was 10(r, 7-12). No DLT or serious adverse event were observed within 28 days of Axi-Cel-2. Following Axi-Cel-2 infusion, 3 patients experienced gr 1 CRS or ICANS, all with onset within 1 day and resolution within 1 day. All 11 pts were discharged within a median of 2 days(r, 2–4) after Axi-Cel-2, with 55% discharged at the minimum 2-day stay. One pt died due to progressive disease. At a median follow-up of 5.8 mos(IQR: 3.1–14.9), the overall response rate(95% CI) was 90.9%(58.7–99.8), including complete response rate of 72.7%(39.0–94.0). The 6-mo rates(95% CI) were 79.5%(39.3–94.5) for duration of response, 78.7%(38.1–94.3) for PFS, and 100% for overall survival. A second CAR-T expansion was observed in 88% of pts receiving the phase 1b dose. Median area-under-the-curve over 28 days was 259 cells/µL×day(n=11; IQR: 63–1094) in pts receiving Axi-cel-2 and 134 cells/µL×day(n=30; IQR: 26–557) in the 2L SOC historical cohort. Spectral flow cytometry showed higher GZMB+ CD8+ and lower PD-1+ proportions in CAR+ cells after Axi-Cel-2 vs SOC axi-cel(n=4; p<0.02). Single-cell RNA-seq revealed increased CX3CR1(2.7 log2FC) and TBX21(T-bet; 1.5 log2FC) and decreased NFKBIA(−1.7 log2FC) (all adj. p<0.001) in circulating CAR-T cells. These findings indicate reduced CAR-T exhaustion with enhanced cytotoxicity, activation, and migration after Axi-Cel-2. Using PhasED-Seq, ctDNA was measured in 7 pts receiving Axi-Cel-2(5 responders and 2 progressors), and median pretreatment ctDNA was 227 hGE/mL(r, 36–891). Among the responders, MRD negativity was 60% at 1 mo and 80% at 3 mos; the remaining pt had decline in ctDNA level to <1 hGE/mL by 3 mos. Both progressors had early ctDNA rise with CD19 antigen escape, confirmed by expression profiling and EPIC-Seq. Conclusion Interim Phase 1b results(n=11) show Axi-Cel-2 was well-tolerated without DLTs and induced a second CAR-T expansion with more cytotoxic, less-exhausted phenotypes and deep molecular responses. These findings support the potential of Axi-Cel-2 to improve outcomes in this high-risk population. Updated results will be presented at the meeting.
Article Details
Authors (37)
Dasom (Caroline) Lee
2Stanford University, Stanford, United States
Kameron Rodrigues
1Stanford University, Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford, United States
Masooma Rana
8Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
Kendall Kozy
1Stanford University, Stanford, United States
Sunny Salazar
3Stanford University School of Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Stanford, United States
Alexandria Jensen
Moksha Desai
5Stanford University School of Medicine, Center for Cancer Cell Therapy, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, United States
Jayasindhu Mallampet
2Stanford University, Stanford, United States
Claire Lohman
7Center for Cell Therapy, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Ying-Wen Huang
Graduate Institute of Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University
Xiaoman Kang
1Stanford University School of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford, United States
Feng Tian
Jurik Mutter
1Stanford University School of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford, United States
Nick Phillips
1Stanford University School of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford, United States
Colleen Schweitzer
1Kite, A Gilead Company, Santa Monica, United States
Faisal Cheema
7Kaiser Permanente, Santa Clara, United States
Lekha Mikkilineni
Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
Andrew Rezvani
21Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
Laura Johnston
2Stanford University School of Medicine, Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Stanford, United States
Judith Shizuru
2Stanford University School of Medicine, Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Stanford, United States
Everett Meyer
Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
Robert Lowsky
2Stanford University School of Medicine, Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Stanford, United States
Wen-Kai Weng
10Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Melody Smith
Sushma Bharadwaj
2Stanford University School of Medicine, Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Stanford, United States
Robert Negrin
1Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Stanford, United States
Surbhi Sidana
Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
Lori Muffly
1Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Bita Sahaf
Yasodha Natkunam
Rhine Shen
1Kite, A Gilead Company, Santa Monica, United States
Matthew Frank
2Stanford University School of Medicine, Medicine, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Stanford, United States
Crystal Mackall
2Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Zinaida Good
1Stanford University, Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford, United States
Ash Alizadeh
4Stanford University, Stanford, United States
David Miklos
Saurabh Dahiya