Dose-response relationship of serum iron, ferritin, and transferrin saturation with cancer-related mortality: An analysis of population-based data.

S Saima Gill (Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan) M Muhammad Zain Raza (King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan) A Ali Ahmad Nadeem (King Edward Medical University, LHR, Lahore, Pakistan) O Oshaz Fatima (Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan) H Hafiz Muhammad Ehsan Arshad (King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan) M Musab Maqsood (King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan) O Omar Abdullah Gill (2King Edward Medical University, Internal Medicine, Lahore, Pakistan) M Muhammad Saad Ur Rehman (Mobile Infirmary Medical Center, Mobile, AL)

Abstract

11043 Background: Altered iron homeostasis has been linked to cancer outcomes, with epidemiologic evidence suggesting that both reduced iron availability (low transferrin saturation or anemia) and elevated iron markers, particularly ferritin, may correspond to higher cancer mortality. However, population-level data quantifying dose–response relationships between continuous iron indices and cancer-related mortality remain limited. This study evaluates the dose–response association of serum iron, transferrin saturation (TSAT), and ferritin with cancer mortality using nationally representative NHANES data. Methods: NHANES laboratory data were linked to National Death Index mortality files (1999–2019). Survey-weighted Cox proportional hazards models and Fine–Gray competing-risk models were used to assess linear, quintile-based, and restricted cubic spline–modeled non-linear relationships between iron biomarkers and cancer mortality. Models were further adjusted to evaluate independent effects of each biomarker. Results: A total of 52,593 participants were included, with 6,875 recorded deaths. In survey-weighted log₂ Cox models, serum iron (HR 1.41; 95% CI 0.17–11.68) and ferritin (HR 1.14; 95% CI 0.84–1.55) showed no significant linear association with cancer mortality, while TSAT suggested a nonsignificant inverse trend (HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.02–5.43). Quintile analyses revealed no consistent dose–response pattern for serum iron or TSAT; ferritin showed lower mortality in the second quintile (HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.12–0.92) without a graded pattern across higher quintiles. In mutually adjusted models including all three biomarkers, none demonstrated independent linear associations. Fine–Gray analyses identified a statistically significant but clinically small association for ferritin, whereas serum iron and TSAT remained nonsignificant. Restricted cubic spline models showed no clear non-linear dose–response for any biomarker. Conclusions: Among the iron indices evaluated, ferritin demonstrated the strongest and most consistent association with cancer-related mortality, although no clear linear or non-linear dose–response pattern emerged. Ferritin may serve as a more informative marker for risk stratification, but further mechanistic and longitudinal studies are warranted.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 11043-11043
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (8)

S

Saima Gill

Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan

M

Muhammad Zain Raza

King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan

A

Ali Ahmad Nadeem

King Edward Medical University, LHR, Lahore, Pakistan

O

Oshaz Fatima

Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan

H

Hafiz Muhammad Ehsan Arshad

King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan

M

Musab Maqsood

King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan

O

Omar Abdullah Gill

2King Edward Medical University, Internal Medicine, Lahore, Pakistan

M

Muhammad Saad Ur Rehman

Mobile Infirmary Medical Center, Mobile, AL