Dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (DA-EPOCH) yields durable remissions and survival in adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL): Long-term follow-up of a prospective trial
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Treatment for adult ALL historically introduces toxicity and complexity that can be prohibitive for some patients (pts). Recently, antigen-targeted agents and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)+ disease have demonstrated sufficient activity to reduce or omit cytotoxic chemotherapy. These regimens yield 3-5-year (yr) overall survival (OS) rates of ~50-80%. However, they may be limited to well-resourced centers due to complexity and cost of administration. DA-EPOCH is familiar to most oncologists and administratively simpler. In a single-arm Phase II trial we conducted, DA-EPOCH ± rituximab (R) ± TKI yielded comparable morphologic (morph) and measurable residual disease (MRD)- remissions with less toxicity than seen in a comparable cohort of patients receiving hyperCVAD. This study completed accrual in 2021, before routine upfront incorporation of immunotherapy and ponatinib (if Ph+). Here, we describe long-term outcomes and explore factors that may predict outcomes to this approach. METHODS Details of this study have been reported (Cassaday, et al. Leuk Lymphoma, 2023; NCT03023046). Adults with newly-diagnosed ALL were eligible if not candidates for pediatric-inspired therapy (e.g., Ph+, age ≥40). Imatinib or dasatinib was added if Ph+, and R if CD20+. Response was determined by bone marrow aspirate morph, multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), high-throughput sequencing (HTS; clonoSEQ) and (for Ph+) BCR::ABL1 RT-PCR. Up to 8 cycles could be given followed by maintenance (POMP±TKI) or allogeneic transplant (HCT). The primary endpoint was rate of MRD- by MFC within 4 cycles. The current analysis focused on OS, relapse-free survival (RFS), and event-free survival (EFS) from treatment start using the Kaplan-Meier method. Events were defined as inability to achieve MRD- by MFC, disease recurrence, or death. RFS was only assessed among pts who achieved remission by morph. RESULTS 53 pts were evaluable, all of whom had ≥1 high-risk feature (ie, age ≥35, high WBC, or cytogenetics per NCCN). Median age was 55 (range: 19-79). 28 pts (53%) are still alive at a median follow-up of 69 months (mo; range: 50-98 mo). Only 2 pts died in remission within 1 yr of treatment start. Of 20 relapses, 8 (15%) involved the CNS, 3 of which were limited to CNS. There was no association between risk of CNS relapse and baseline cerebrospinal fluid testing by morph or MFC. 11 pts underwent HCT directly after DA-EPOCH, and 6 (55%) relapsed, range of 2-43 mo post-HCT. Among Ph+ pts (n=28), median OS was not reached (NR), median RFS was NR, and median EFS was 15 mo; 5-yr estimates (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 68% (53-88%), 56% (40-78%), and 36% (22-59%) for OS, RFS, and EFS, respectively. For the Ph- cohort (n=25), median OS was 52 mo, median RFS was NR, and median EFS was 15 mo; 5-yr estimates were 44% (28-68%), 56% (37-84%), and 24% (12-48%), for OS, RFS, and EFS, respectively. Among pts age ≥55, survival reflected that of the overall population: for Ph+ (n = 15), median OS was NR, median RFS was 24 mo, and median EFS was 19 mo; 5-yr estimates were 53% (33-86%), 50% (30-84%), and 33% (16-68%), for OS, RFS, and EFS, respectively. For age ≥55 Ph- (n = 12), median OS was 58 mo, median RFS was NR, and median EFS was 13 mo; 5-yr estimates were 50% (28-88%), 67% (42-100%), and 25% (9-67%), for OS, RFS, and EFS, respectively. In univariate Cox models, neither age (continuous or categorical with age 55 as a cutpoint), WBC, cytogenetic risk, LDH, nor use of R had statistically significant associations with OS, RFS, or EFS. When comparing outcomes by MRD status after 4 cycles across assay types, the only significant association was between MRD- status by HTS and EFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.70, p = 0.005); however, 17 of 31 (55%) not MRD- by HTS also did not reach MRD- by MFC, which itself defined an event. Pts received a median of 4 cycles of DA-EPOCH (interquartile range: 3-6). 8 pts (15%) switched to blinatumomab when MRD+ after DA-EPOCH, with none receiving it when MRD-. CONCLUSIONS DA-EPOCH±R±TKI yields durable remissions, with survival comparable to immunotherapy-based strategies for ALL. Unlike many other approaches, outcomes for older pts were similar to the general study population. These results support DA-EPOCH±R±TKI as a curative-intent option, particularly in resource-limited settings. They also validate DA-EPOCH as an effective backbone to which new agents for ALL may be added.
Article Details
Authors (15)
Mitin Nachu
1University of Washington, Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine Residency Program, Seattle, United States
Philip Stevenson
4Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
Kim Quach
3University of Washington School of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Seattle, United States
Christen Martino
3University of Washington School of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Seattle, United States
Mary-Elizabeth Percival
1University of Washington, Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), Seattle, United States
Anna Halpern
1University of Washington, Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), Seattle, United States
Pamela Becker
1City of Hope, Duarte, United States
Vivian Oehler
1University of Washington, Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), Seattle, United States
Jason P. Cooper
3University of Washington School of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Seattle, United States
Johnnie Orozco
1University of Washington, Hematology/Oncology, Seattle, United States
Paul Hendrie
1University of Washington, Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), Seattle, United States
Roland Walter
1University of Washington, Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), Seattle, United States
Cristina Maria Ghiuzeli
1University of Washington, Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), Seattle, United States
Raya Mawad
1University of Washington, Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), Seattle, United States
Ryan Cassaday
1University of Washington, Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), Seattle, United States