Donafenib and sintilimab plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II, biomarker exploratory study (DosinTACE).

X Xiaoyun Hu (Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, China Medical University) Y Yifei Huang (State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University) G Guosheng Yuan (Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) M Mengya Zang (Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) K Kunyuan Wang (Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) Q Qi Li H Hongyan Liu (CAS Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ionic Liquids Clean Process, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China) P Peilin Zhu (Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) J Jingyi Zhao J Jinzhang Chen (Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China)

Abstract

549 Background: Despite the combination of anti-angiogenics and immune checkpoint inhibitors being the standard for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), further improvements are needed to prolong overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and increase the objective response rate (ORR). This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and biomarkers of donafenib and sintilimab plus TACE as the first-line treatment for uHCC. Methods: DosinTACE is a single-arm phase II study that includes a safety run-in and an expansion phase. The safety run-in phase determined the recommended dose of donafenib. Systemic treatment-naive uHCC patients received up to four cycles of TACE within 16 weeks, along with donafenib and sintilimab until progression or intolerable toxicity. Primary endpoint was the ORR per mRECIST. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) of tumor biopsy samples was performed to characterize the tumor microenvironment (TME). Results: Donafenib was adjusted to 100 mg bid for the expansion phase. A total of 44 patients were enrolled and analyzed: median age, 59.1 years; 90.9% with HBV infection; 52.3% BCLC stage C and 47.7% BCLC stage B; 79.5% had multiple tumors; 68.2% exceeded the up-to-seven criteria. At a median follow-up of 15.2 months, according to mRECIST, the ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were 81.8% and 90.9%, respectively, with a time to response (TTR) of 1.7 months. The median PFS was 17.3 months (95% CI, 7.3-NA), with a 1-year PFS rate of 51.8% (95% CI, 35.5%-75.7%). In comparison, per RECIST 1.1 criteria, the ORR and DCR were 50.5% and 90.9%, respectively. The median PFS was 10.6 months (95% CI, 6.8-NA), with a 1-year PFS rate of 49.8% (95% CI, 33.8%-73.4%). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached, and the 1-year OS rate was 83.5% (95% CI, 72.1%-96.6%). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 40.9% of patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred. snRNA-seq revealed TME heterogeneity may drive treatment response differences. Non-responders had hypoxia/glycolysis/proliferation-enriched tumor cells and CAF-driven pro-fibrotic, immune-cold microenvironments, while responders exhibited active immune-tumor crosstalk. Conclusions: DosinTACE study demonstrates that the combination of TACE, donafenib, and sintilimab shows promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with uHCC. Moreover, tumor-intrinsic metabolic and immune disparities drive treatment response variability. Clinical trial information: NCT05507632 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 2_suppl
Published January 10, 2026
Pages 549-549
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (10)

X

Xiaoyun Hu

Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, China Medical University

Y

Yifei Huang

State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University

G

Guosheng Yuan

Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

M

Mengya Zang

Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

K

Kunyuan Wang

Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Q

Qi Li

H

Hongyan Liu

CAS Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ionic Liquids Clean Process, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

P

Peilin Zhu

Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

J

Jingyi Zhao

J

Jinzhang Chen

Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China