Does cytoplasmic AR-V7 circulating tumor cell (CTC) detection add utility in predicting AR pathway inhibitor benefit in men with mCRPC? A retrospective analysis of the PROPHECY study.

S Santosh Gupta (Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA) S Susan Halabi (From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...) S Siyuan Guo (Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Ecological Security and Green Development Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Quality Improvement and Ecological Restoration for Watersheds School of Ecology, Environment and Resources Guangdong University of Technology Guangzhou 510006 P.R. China) J Jane McKenzie (Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC) D Daniel J. George (Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC) D David M. Nanus (Weill Cornell Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY) R Russell Zelig Szmulewitz (Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) D Daniel Costin Danila (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) R Rick Wenstrup (Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA) E Emmanuel S. Antonarakis (Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota) A Andrew J. Armstrong

Abstract

5043 Background: Androgen receptor splice variant-7 (AR-V7) is a constitutively active truncated protein that emerges during hormone therapy resistance in prostate cancer. We have shown that circulating tumor cell (CTC) AR-V7 nuclear localization is strongly associated with worse responses, PFS, and overall survival with AR pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) such as abiraterone or enzalutamide in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) setting. The measurement of cytoplasmic AR-V7, however, has unclear predictive value and we thus sought to determine whether an AR-V7-agnostic CTC scoring criterion would identify more patients with ARPI resistance as compared to nuclear AR-V7 in the PROPHECY study (NCT02269982). Methods: Blood samples were available from 110 of 118pre-ARPI mCRPC patients and evaluated for both nuclear and cytoplasmic CTC only AR-V7 detection utilizing Epic’s CTC platform and associated with confirmed PSA50 response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). We also assessed the correlation between AR overexpression and AR-V7 detection. The proportional hazards model was utilized to explore the prognostic significance of nuclear, cytoplasmic AR-V7 in predicting OS and PFS adjusting for Halabi clinical risk score and CellSearch CTCs≥5. Results: At baseline, 11/107 (10%) mCRPC samples had AR-V7 nuclear expression, 15/107 (14%) had cytoplasmic only AR-V7 detection, and thus 26/107 (24%) cases were CTC AR-V7 positive. All of the nuclear AR-V7 positive cases had AR overexpression, while only 67% of cytoplasmic AR-V7 positive cases exhibited AR overexpression. We observed a confirmed PSA50 in 0%, 13%, and 29.6% of nuclear V7+, cytoplasmic V7+, and V7- patients. See the table for PFS and OS outcomes. Conclusions: Cytoplasmic AR-V7 detection in CTCs is more prevalent than nuclear only scoring. Cytoplasmic AR-V7 positive cases appear to have worse PFS, PSA50, and OS as compared to AR-v7 negative cases. However, men with cytoplasmic only CTC AR-V7 detection were more likely to have post-ARPI short term PSA declines and improved overall survival, despite a similar poor PFS as compared to nuclear AR-V7 positive patients with mCRPC. Knowledge of both CTC nuclear and cytoplasmic AR-V7 status could be helpful for improved risk stratification of patients with mCRPC prior to ARPI therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02269982 . N=107 baseline Median (95% CI), months UnivariateHR (95%CI) Multivariate HR (95%CI) OS based on AR-V7 status Nuclear AR-V7 8.4 (7.0, NR) 3.6 (1.9, 7.0) 3.7 (1.7, 8.4) Cytoplasmic AR-V7 only 14.7 (10.8, 27.3) 2.0 (1.1, 3.6) 1.2 (0.6, 2.5) AR-V7 negative 21.8 (18.9, 29.2) Reference Reference PFS based on AR-V7 status Nuclear AR-V7 3.7 (2.3, NR) 2.6 (1.4, 5.1) 2.9 (1.3, 6.2) Cytoplasmic AR-V7 only 3.8 (2.7, 8.5) 2.2 (1.2, 3.9) 1.7 (0.8, 3.4) AR-V7 negative 7.4 (5.5, 9.0) Reference Reference

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 5043-5043
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (11)

S

Santosh Gupta

Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA

S

Susan Halabi

From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...

S

Siyuan Guo

Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Ecological Security and Green Development Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Quality Improvement and Ecological Restoration for Watersheds School of Ecology, Environment and Resources Guangdong University of Technology Guangzhou 510006 P.R. China

J

Jane McKenzie

Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

D

Daniel J. George

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

D

David M. Nanus

Weill Cornell Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY

R

Russell Zelig Szmulewitz

Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

D

Daniel Costin Danila

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

R

Rick Wenstrup

Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA

E

Emmanuel S. Antonarakis

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota

A

Andrew J. Armstrong