Do chip mutations predict frailty and toxicity in transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma?

S Steven Chun-Min Shih (1Cross Cancer Institute, Oncology, Edmonton, Canada) H Harjot Singh Vohra (1Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Toronto, Canada) S Sahar Khan (3Windsor Regional Cancer Centre, Windsor, Canada) S Salman Basrai E Esther Masih-Khan (1Princess Margaret Cancer Center - University Health Network, Toronto, Canada) A Anup Devasia (5The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada) D Donna Reece (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto) S Suzanne Trudel (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto) K Keith Stewart (1Princess Margaret Cancer Center - University Health Network, Toronto, Canada) S Sita Bhella V Vishal Kukreti (1Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Toronto, Canada) C Chloe Yang (1Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Toronto, Canada) G Guido Lancman (1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada) R Rodger Tiedemann (1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada) A Anca Prica (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto) E Eugene Leung (2Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Medical Oncology & Haematology, Toronto, Canada) A Aaron Schimmer S Sagi Abelson C Christine Chen (University of Southern California, Department of Neurobiology)

Abstract

Abstract Background We have previously reported that current frailty tools have limited ability to predict treatment-related toxicity in transplant-eligible (TE) patients with multiple myeloma (MM) (Devasia, ASH 2022). Although clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) mutations has been associated with more frailty and treatment-related toxicities in patients with newly diagnosed MM (Gelli, Scientific Reports 2024), their clinical relevance specifically in TE patients has yet to be elucidated. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether the presence of CHIP mutations predicts frailty and toxicity in patients preparing for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Method We have two ongoing prospective trials in TE-MM patients at our centre. The “Frailty” study evaluates the utility of various frailty assessments prior to ASCT in predicting transplant-related toxicity and outcomes (Shih, IMS 2025). The ARCH-001 study evaluates the prevalence and evolution of CHIP mutations at different time points relevant to their ASCT (Khan, ASH 2024). Patients enrolled in both studies were selected for this correlative analysis. The presence of CHIP mutations prior to ASCT (ARCH-001) served as the predictor variable. The following variables extracted from Frailty study served as the outcome variables: 1) subjective measures of function (Rockwood Frailty, Karnofsky Performance [KPS], ECOG), 2) objective measures of fitness [hand grip strength, 6-min walk test, Timed Up and Go, 3) comorbidity indices (Charlson and HCT-CI), 4) organ function (eGFR, serum albumin, BNP, PFT, ECHO), 5) Post-ASCT acute grade ≥3 organ toxicities and mortality to Day 100, ICU use, time to engraftment, transfusion requirements and length of stay (LOS). Chi2or Fisher's exact test was used as appropriate for categorical variables. T-test was used for continuous variables. All P values were 2 sided and statistically significant at P < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 19. Results We identified 101 participants who were enrolled in both studies and had evaluable data. Of these, 38 (37.6%) had at least one CHIP mutation and 5 (5.0%) had two CHIP mutations. DNMT3A, ASXL1 and TET2 mutations were most common, with 30 (29.7%) patients having at least one of these. Pre-ASCT There was a greater proportion of patients with CHIP mutation in those age ≥65 than those age <65 (76.3% vs 23.7% respectively, P=0.025), but no difference in other demographics (sex, BMI), or pre-transplant parameters (first vs salvage transplant, melphalan dose or stem cell dose). The presence of CHIP mutations was not associated with increased all-grade anemia, leukopenia or thrombocytopenia prior to ASCT (P = 0.443, P = 0.204 and P = 0.259, respectively), or any of the frailty parameters (data will be presented). Post-ASCT There was no correlation between the presence of CHIP mutations and any of the acute grade ≥3 transplant-related toxicities. There were only 2 ICU admissions and 0 deaths by day+100. There was a trend towards more cardiac-related adverse events in patients with CHIP mutations compared to those without (21.1% vs 9.5% respectively), but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.057). There was also a trend towards more cumulative toxicity (defined as ≥2 toxicity events) in those with CHIP mutations compared to those without (50.0% vs.31.8% respectively), but this was not statistically significant either (P = 0.068). The mean number of days to neutrophil and platelet engraftment in all patients was 12.6 and 17.6, respectively. The presence of CHIP mutations was not associated with prolonging these (P = 0.395 and P = 0.202, respectively). The mean number of bags of red cells and platelets required for transfusion during ASCT in all patients was 0.5 (0-8) and 1.0 (0-9), respectively. The presence of CHIP mutations did not increase these either (P = 0.109 and P = 0.230). The mean LOS in those with vs without CHIP mutations was 22.1 and 17.9 days, respectively, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.197). Conclusion The presence of CHIP mutations in TE-MM patients was not associated with increased frailty, acute grade ≥3 transplant-related toxicity or any short-term transplant-related outcomes. However, this was a highly selected population that tends to be younger and fitter. Continued follow-up is required to evaluate whether these CHIP mutations affect longer-term treatment-related efficacy, toxicity or survival outcomes in TE-MM patients.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 5773-5773
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (19)

S

Steven Chun-Min Shih

1Cross Cancer Institute, Oncology, Edmonton, Canada

H

Harjot Singh Vohra

1Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Toronto, Canada

S

Sahar Khan

3Windsor Regional Cancer Centre, Windsor, Canada

S

Salman Basrai

E

Esther Masih-Khan

1Princess Margaret Cancer Center - University Health Network, Toronto, Canada

A

Anup Devasia

5The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada

D

Donna Reece

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto

S

Suzanne Trudel

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto

K

Keith Stewart

1Princess Margaret Cancer Center - University Health Network, Toronto, Canada

S

Sita Bhella

V

Vishal Kukreti

1Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Toronto, Canada

C

Chloe Yang

1Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Toronto, Canada

G

Guido Lancman

1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada

R

Rodger Tiedemann

1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada

A

Anca Prica

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto

E

Eugene Leung

2Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Medical Oncology & Haematology, Toronto, Canada

A

Aaron Schimmer

S

Sagi Abelson

C

Christine Chen

University of Southern California, Department of Neurobiology