DNA‐mimic for Specific Surface Functionalization of Zr‐MOFs for Bacterial Targeting

A Anna Scheeder (Department of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK) J Jon Ostolaza‐Paraiso (Department of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK) A Andrew G. Baker (Department of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK) J Juan F. Blandez (Department of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK) G Georgina E. Lindop (Department of Material Science and Metallurgy University of Cambridge Cambridge UK) S Simon M. Fairclough L Ljiljana Fruk I Ioanna Mela (Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge CB3 0AS, U.K.) D David Fairen‐Jimenez (Department of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK) C Clemens F. Kaminski (Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nanosized metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are versatile platforms used in biomedical applications due to their high loading capacity, large surface area, and tunable functionality. Without surface modifications, these nanoparticles lack cell specificity and are prone to aggregation and degradation in biological environments, reducing their effectiveness. Surface attachment of DNA via phosphate group coordination to zirconium‐based MOFs improves stability, but DNA binding remains non‐site‐specific due to the abundance of phosphate groups in its backbone, limiting DNA's addressability for further functionalization. To address this issue, we present a novel, significantly faster single‐step approach for the post‐synthesis modification of the external surface of PCN‐222 nanoparticles using an uncharged synthetic mimic of DNA, peptide nucleic acids (PNA). By using phosphate‐modified PNA, we achieve surface functionalization through coordination with the Zr 6 clusters on the MOF surface. The modification produced monodispersed nanoparticles and resulted in slowed drug‐release kinetics compared to unmodified nanoparticles. PNAs enhanced attachment efficiency and hybridization specificity compared to DNA coatings, allowing subsequent conjugation of protein targeting moieties and enabling bacterial targeting of drug‐loaded MOFs. This work introduces phosphotyrosine‐modified PNA as a superior, single‐step surface coating for PCN‐222, allowing controlled post‐functionalization with single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) and expanding applications in biomedical and materials science.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 65, Issue 30
Published July 20, 2026
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (10)

A

Anna Scheeder

Department of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

J

Jon Ostolaza‐Paraiso

Department of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

A

Andrew G. Baker

Department of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

J

Juan F. Blandez

Department of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

G

Georgina E. Lindop

Department of Material Science and Metallurgy University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

S

Simon M. Fairclough

L

Ljiljana Fruk

I

Ioanna Mela

Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge CB3 0AS, U.K.

D

David Fairen‐Jimenez

Department of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

C

Clemens F. Kaminski

Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology