Discovering Electron‐Sponge Behavior at Organic‐Metal Interfaces for CO <sub>2</sub> Electroreduction via Machine Learning

H Haochen Shen (School of Chemical Engineering and Technology) B Bin Jiang X Xiaodong Yang (State Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering) N Ningce Zhang (State Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering) H Hao Jiang S Shuxuan Liu (State Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering) L Luoming Kang (School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Tianjin University Tianjin 300072 China) L Luhong Zhang (School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Tianjin University Tianjin 300072 China) X Xiaoming Xao (School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Tianjin University Tianjin 300072 China) Y Yongli Sun (School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Tianjin University Tianjin 300072 China) X Xiaowei Tantai (School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Tianjin University Tianjin 300072 China) G Guobin Wen (State Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering) N Na Yang (School of Materials and Energy) B Bohua Ren (State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering) S Shuangyin Wang (State Key Laboratory of Chem/Bio-Sensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering)

Abstract

Abstract Molecular regulation at organic‐metal interfaces is crucial for C─C coupling in CO 2 electroreduction, directly influencing the formation of multi‐carbon (C 2+ ) products. However, the non‐linear interplay of electronic, spatial, and topological molecular descriptors has hindered the establishment of predictive quantitative structure‐activity relationships (QSAR), limiting mechanistic insight. Herein, we employed an interpretable machine learning (ML)‐QSAR framework to link molecular features with the C─C coupling free energy barrier (ΔG‡) on Cu surfaces, uncovering the dominant role of interfacial “electron‐sponge” behavior. Mechanistically, the modifier molecule donates electrons to Cu, which subsequently redistributes them to *CO/*CHO intermediates and the molecule itself, while also directly stabilizing the intermediates. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis identifies key electronic descriptors, including low minimal local electron affinity (LEA min ), narrow HOMO‐LUMO gap and elevated HOMO energy. These descriptors govern the electron‐sponge mechanism, facilitating the reduction of ΔG‡. As a representative molecule, 3,4‐diaminofurazan (DAF), selected from a library of 5,304 graph‐theory‐derived compounds, incorporates electron‐donating and back‐donating amino and furan‐azole motifs. Experimental validation shows a 1.8‐fold increase in C 2+ Faradaic efficiency, from 42% to 77%, confirming the QSAR framework's effectiveness. This descriptor‐driven approach was further extended to Au and Ag systems, providing a scalable pathway for designing next‐generation electrocatalysts.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 65, Issue 9
Published February 23, 2026
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (15)

H

Haochen Shen

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology

B

Bin Jiang

X

Xiaodong Yang

State Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

N

Ningce Zhang

State Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

H

Hao Jiang

S

Shuxuan Liu

State Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

L

Luoming Kang

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Tianjin University Tianjin 300072 China

L

Luhong Zhang

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Tianjin University Tianjin 300072 China

X

Xiaoming Xao

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Tianjin University Tianjin 300072 China

Y

Yongli Sun

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Tianjin University Tianjin 300072 China

X

Xiaowei Tantai

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Tianjin University Tianjin 300072 China

G

Guobin Wen

State Key Laboratory of Chemo and Biosensing, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

N

Na Yang

School of Materials and Energy

B

Bohua Ren

State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

S

Shuangyin Wang

State Key Laboratory of Chem/Bio-Sensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering