Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency–related variants among Mexican patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies.

Abstract

1618 Background: DPD deficiency is the most important risk factor for developing fluoropyrimidine-related adverse events. Genetic variants causing DPD deficiency are found in 6-8% of Caucasian patients. However, there is limited information on their prevalence in underrepresented ethnic groups, such as Hispanics and Latinos, and testing for these variants is not routinely recommended in Latin America. Our goal was to assess the allele frequency of clinically actionable dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase ( DPYD) risk variants defined by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) among admixed Mexican patients with GI malignancies. Methods: Patients with recently diagnosed GI cancer candidates for fluropyrimidine therapy were recruited from a single institution in Mexico City. After providing informed consent, a blood sample and clinical characteristics were collected. We utilized the Illumina Infinium Global Screening Array (GSA)-to genotype 34 DPYD variants, six of which are known to lead to an increased risk of fluoropyrimidine toxicity and are considered clinically actionable. Results: Two hundred and eight patients with a mean age of 62 years (SD 13.2) were included. 47% were female. The most common type of cancer was colorectal (38%) followed by pancreas (22%) and biliary tract (18%). DNA samples from 192 patients passed quality control, of which 156 (62%) received fluoropyrimidines during follow-up. Only 2 patients (1%) were heterozygous for actionable DPYD intermediate metabolizer risk variant alleles: one with c.2846A > T ( rs67376798 , D949V) and one with c.1129–5923C > G [ rs75017182; HapB3 SNP c.1236G > A; rs56038477]. No patients were found to have other CPIC-listed DPYD risk variants . Additionally, we investigated the allele frequencies of other 30 DPYD variants and observed low-frequency variation (between 0.260 and 0.0032) in rs56038477, rs1801160, rs17376848, rs1801159, rs1801158, rs45589337, rs2297595, rs200562975, and rs1801265. Several of these may be related to decreased DPYD activity and warrant further analysis regarding their impact on adverse drug reactions. Conclusions: In contrast with reports from Caucasic populations, we found a very low allele frequency of DPYD actionable variants. Our findings highlight the limitation of current pharmacogenomic testing recommendations and panels, which may not be appropriate for admixed ethnic populations such as Hispanics/Latinos due to disparities in representation. There is a need to study the role of other DPYD variants in larger patient samples to understand their role in the toxicity risk of admixed populations in Mexico and Latin America, to explore the use of novel techniques such as Next Generation Sequencing, and to investigate the effect of other related genes on toxicity risk.