Digital health intervention for comorbid insomnia and neurocognitive impairment in adult survivors of childhood cancer: Results from a randomized clinical trial.
Abstract
10003 Background: Survivors of childhood cancer are at risk of developing both insomnia and cognitive impairment, which may persist decades following treatment. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the gold-standard treatment for insomnia, yet the impact of improved sleep on comorbid cognitive dysfunction has not been evaluated in survivors. Methods: Survivors enrolled in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS; median age 44 [range 23-66] years; 73% female; 37% leukemia, 23% lymphoma, 18% sarcoma, 14% Wilms, 8% neuroblastoma) with comorbid insomnia and neurocognitive impairment were randomized 1:1 to 9-week digital CBT-I vs. online sleep education (SE). Insomnia severity index (ISI), neurocognitive problems (CCSS-Neurocognitive Questionnaire [NCQ]), emotional health (Patient Health Questionnaire/Generalized Anxiety Disorder), and quality of life (PROMIS) were measured at baseline and 9-week and 6-month follow-ups. Intent-to-treat models estimated treatment effects for ISI (mean difference [MD] between CBT-I and SE of change from baseline to follow-ups) adjusted for age, sex, and cranial radiation. Cohen’s d estimated effect size. Additional models estimated treatment effects on secondary outcomes and mediation by improved ISI. Results: 439 of 541 randomized survivors completed baseline assessments and started the intervention (82% CBT-I; 81% SE); 353 of those completed 9-week (76% CBT-I; 85% SE) and 305 completed 6-month (61% CBT-I; 78% SE) post-intervention assessments. Survivors randomized to CBT-I reported improved ISI scores at 9 weeks (MD=-2.4[95%CI -3.4, -1.4]; Cohen’s d =0.50) and 6 months post-intervention (MD=- 3.5[-4.6, -2.4]; d =0.72) vs. SE (both p’s<0.001). Survivors randomized to CBT-I reported greater improvement in memory (9wks: MD=-0.3SD [-0.5, -0.1], p=0.003; 6mos: MD=-0.5SD [-0.7, -0.3], p<0.001) and task efficiency (9wks: MD=-0.3SD [-0.5, -0.1], p=0.003; 6mos: MD=-0.5SD [-0.7, -0.3], p<0.001) vs. SE. Effects of CBT-I on cognitive function were mediated by improved ISI scores (42-65% mediated, all p’s <0.001). Insomnia responders (those who reported a change in ISI from >8 [mild to severe insomnia] to <8 [no insomnia]) also reported improved quality of life (9wks: mental beta=1.7[95%CI 0.4, 3.0], physical=2.1 [1.0, 3.1]; 6mos: mental=3.5 [2.0, 5.0], physical=3.3 [2.1, 4.5]), and emotional health (9wks: anxiety beta=-1.3 [-2.1,-0.5], depression=-1.8[-2.6, -1.0]; 6mos: anxiety=-1.8 [-2.7, -0.8], depression=-2.4 [-3.4, -1.4]). Conclusions: Use of a fully automated digital health treatment of insomnia confers immediate and long-term benefits to comorbid cognitive impairment and quality of life in survivors of childhood cancer. Given its efficacy and availability, digital CBT-I should be considered for the behavioral treatment of insomnia and comorbid symptoms in survivors. Clinical trial information: NCT04317742 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (14)
Tara M. Brinkman
Kayla Stratton
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
Chiara Papini
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
Lee Ritterband
University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
Kathy Ruble
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Ramona Vejandla
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
Shani Alston
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
Vikki G. Nolan
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
Nazneen Kaleem Shaikh
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
Karen Ingersoll
University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
Daniel A. Mulrooney
Gregory T. Armstrong
Wendy Leisenring
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
Kevin R. Krull