Different folding mechanisms in prion proteins from mammals with different disease susceptibility observed at the single-molecule level

U Uttam Anand (Department of Physics, University of Alberta) S Shubhadeep Patra (Department of Physics, University of Alberta) R Rohith Vedhthaanth Sekar (Department of Physics, University of Alberta) C Craig R. Garen (Department of Physics, University of Alberta) M Michael T. Woodside (Department of Physics, University of Alberta)

Abstract

Misfolding of the protein PrP causes prion diseases in mammals. Disease susceptibility varies widely among species, despite PrP sequences differing by only a few amino acids. How these differences alter PrP folding and misfolding remains unclear. We compared the folding dynamics of single PrP molecules from three species with different disease susceptibility: dogs (immune), hamsters (susceptible), and bank voles (extremely susceptible). Measurements with optical tweezers revealed important differences between the folding cooperativity, pathways, energy barriers, and kinetics of these proteins. In contrast to the two-state folding of hamster PrP, dog PrP always folded through multiple intermediates. However, both featured rapid native folding, homogeneous energy barriers, and no readily observable misfolding. Bank vole PrP also folded via intermediates, but more slowly and via inhomogeneous barriers. Most notably, it formed several metastable misfolded states starting from the unfolded state. Analyzing the sequence of intermediates seen in pulling curves, we found significant differences in the folding pathways for dog and bank vole PrP, implying that sequence mutations altered energy barriers so as to redirect folding pathways. These results show that subtle differences in PrP sequence between species produce profound changes in folding behavior, providing insight into the factors underlying misfolding propensity.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 122, Issue 29
Published July 22, 2025
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (5)

U

Uttam Anand

Department of Physics, University of Alberta

S

Shubhadeep Patra

Department of Physics, University of Alberta

R

Rohith Vedhthaanth Sekar

Department of Physics, University of Alberta

C

Craig R. Garen

Department of Physics, University of Alberta

M

Michael T. Woodside

Department of Physics, University of Alberta