Diagnostic evaluation methods and prognostic impact of FLT3-ITD microclones in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): A retrospective multicenter study on behalf of the EHA AML-specialized working group (SWG)
Abstract
Abstract ELN recommendations for AML diagnosis, genetic risk stratification and treatment have been updated in 2022. Accordingly, FLT3-ITD+ AML is now included in the intermediate-risk category, regardless of the allelic ratio (AR), and capillary electrophoresis (CE) is the recommended detection method. In two large trials combining intensive chemotherapy with the FLT3 inhibitors midostaurin (RATIFY) and quizartinib (QuANTUM-First), the AR threshold to define FLT3-ITD+ was conventionally set at 0.05 and 0.03, respectively. CE analysis requires high level of expertise specifically to detect FLT3-ITD microclones (FLT3-ITDm, AR: >0.01,<0.05), whose clinical role is not yet well established. Here, we leveraged the EHA AML-SWG framework to explore diagnostic evaluation methods and prognostic impact of FLT3-ITDmin AML. In a first methodological part, results of CE from 63 FLT3-ITD+patient samples were blindly analyzed by 7 European labs, and reproducibility of results was assessed. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was computed as an index of interrater reliability of AR data. Overall, we observed a good ICC for ITD length determination (95%CI=0.52–0.92), but a less satisfactory ICC for AR estimation (95%CI=0.06–0.63). Next, we compared NGS and CE for FLT3-ITD status determination, by running in parallel an additional set of 48 FLT3-ITD+ AML cases. Results showed a significant correlation of AR/VAF (r=0.923,p<0.001), and a 94% concordance overlap, with only 3/48 cases with AR<0.02 detected by CE, but not by NGS. Next, we enrolled AML patients diagnosed between 2017 and 2022 with FLT3-ITD AR<0.05 by CE, and a comparator cohort of cases with AR>0.05 treated with standard chemotherapy without FLT3-inhibitors, or with less-intensive strategies. A total of658 patients with FLT3-ITD+ AML were included in our study. Of these, 212 (32%) had FLT3-ITDm (AR range:0.01-0.04), whereas 446 (68%) had an AR>0.05 (0.05-15.26). Median age at AML onset was 59 years (range 18-94). Patients with microclones were older (62 vs 58 years, p<0.001), and had a less proliferative phenotype. AML with FLT3-ITDm were also more frequently classified as “secondary” with regards to disease ontogeny (14% vs 8%, p=0.012), and had a higher frequency of myelodysplasia-related (MR) genes mutations (60% vs 30%, p<0.001), whereas no difference was noticed for NPM1. A total of 161 patients (24%, median age 76 years) were deemed unfit and were managed with less-intensive approaches, while 497 patients (76%) received intensive chemotherapy. Among the latter, complete response (CR) was achieved in 88% of cases with AR>0.05 vs. 74% of cases with FLT3-ITDm (p<0.001). CR achievement was associated with younger age (p<0.001), presence of NPM1 (p=0.018), absence of DNMT3A (p=0.035) and MR-genes (p=0.011) mutations, FLT3-ITD AR >0.05 (p<0.001), and ELN 2017/22 favorable/intermediate vs adverse categories (p=0.015/0.045). With a median follow-up of 30 months (18-41), 3-year overall survival (OS) was 58% in intensively treated patients, censoring for transplant. The multivariable analysis (MVA) for OS, including clinical and genetic variables, and ELN 2022 categories, showed that increasing age and WBC, together with NPM1 mutation had an independent prognostic role (HR=1.03, 1.03 and 0.63 respectively, p<0.001, 0.021 and 0.012, respectively). Overall, 136 intensively treated patients (27%) relapsed at a median of 8 months (range 1-56) from AML diagnosis, leading to a 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 47%, when censoring for transplant, with no impact of FLT3-ITD AR (HR=0.9, p=0.6). The MVA identified increased WBC and presence of NPM1mutation as independent predictors of DFS (HR=1 and 0.61, p=0.007 and 0.017, respectively). Of cases with available FLT3-ITD status at relapse (n=33), 45% remained positive, of which 64% were originally FLT3-ITDm. Dissecting their FLT3-ITD clonal make-up, the majority (91%) recapitulated the same clone harbored at onset (18% also acquiring additional clones, and 27% losing prior clones), whereas a new clone was detected in 9% of cases. Finally, the clonal burden expanded in all cases (median 0.027 vs 0.686, p<0.001), with 89% of FLT3-ITDm patients relapsing with AR >0.05. Our data show that FLT3-ITDmare associated with older age, secondary-type AML and higher frequency of MR-gene mutations vs AML with FLT3-ITD >0.05. The potential benefit of FLT3 inhibitors in patients with FLT3-ITDm needs to be evaluated in randomized clinical trials.
Article Details
Authors (30)
Carmelo Gurnari
1Translational Hematology & Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
Tiziana Ottone
1Tor Vergata University, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Rome, Italy
Alfonso Piciocchi
4GIMEMA, Rome, Italy
Daniela Späth
1Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Annika Meid
4University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Giovanni Marsili
4GIMEMA, Rome, Italy
Emiliano Fabiani
1Hematology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
Francesca Romano
Maria Rosaria Pascale
Patrizia Chiusolo
6Section of Hematology, Department of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Catholic University, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
Mauro Di Ianni
1University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, Chieti, Italy
Marta Sobas
Lorenzo Brunetti
6Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
Guadalupe Oñate
9Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, IIB-Sant Pau and José Carreras Leukemia Research Institutes, Barcelona, Spain
Joana Brioso Infante
14Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal
Jacopo Nanni
1Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Calogero Vetro
1Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige), Teaching Hospital of Paracelsus Medical University, Bolzano, Italy
Matilde Boada
1Hospital de Clínicas. Facultad de Medicina. Universidad de la Republica., Unidad Academica de Hematologia., Montevideo, Uruguay
Anna Candoni
33. Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Materno-Infantili e dell'Adulto, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, AOU di Modena, Modena, Italy
Jorge Sierra
9Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, IIB-Sant Pau and José Carreras Leukemia Research Institutes, Barcelona, Spain
Nicola Potter
5King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Amanda Gilkes
42Department of Haematology, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Sean Johnson
15Cardiff University, Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Ian Thomas
Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Brain Huntley
25University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Nigel Russell
26Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Richard Dillon
5King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Hartmut Döhner
1Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Konstanze Döhner
12University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Maria Teresa Voso