Development of an endometrial cancer test from a vaginal swab.

B Bridget Z. Gagrat (Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI) J Jamie Nadine Bakkum-Gamez (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) M Martin Krockenberger (Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI) M Mark Camardo (Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI) J John B. Kisiel (Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) S Seth Slettedahl (Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) M Maureen Lemens (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) W William R. Taylor S Shariska Harrington J Julia Zella (Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI) E Elle Kielar-Grevstad (Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI) T Tomasz M. Beer (Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI) M Marilyn Olson (Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI)

Abstract

5624 Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic cancer and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is the predominant presenting symptom. While <10% of AUB represents underlying EC, endometrial sampling is currently required to rule out EC. To develop an alternative, non-invasive rule-out strategy, we aimed to refine a previously reported EC-associated methylated DNA marker (MDM) panel in vaginal swabs. Methods: Patients ≥18 years old with AUB who met ACOG recommendations for endometrial sampling and those undergoing a hysterectomy for biopsy-proven EC or atypical hyperplasia (AH) were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter cohort study. A vaginal fluid specimen was collected via swab by a provider during a speculum exam. DNA was extracted from samples and bisulfite treated, followed by a target and signal amplification method to detect 8 previously identified MDMs. The cross-validated EC classification model used the mean of standardized MDMs. Clinical classification of benign endometrium (BE), EC, and AH was based on central pathology review. EC diagnoses were based on hysterectomy specimens. Endometrioid and mucinous constituted type 1 EC; serous, carcinosarcoma, clear cell, and mixed histology ECs were collectively analyzed as type 2. Results: Of 693 participants enrolled, 670 were evaluable with valid results: 524 in the AUB cohort and 146 in the suspected EC cohort. Within the AUB cohort, 16 had EC or AH. The final analysis cohort included 508 BE, 156 EC, and 6 AH. Of the evaluable participants 20% identified as Black, 3% Asian or Pacific Islander, 75% White, and 3% Other; 7% reported Hispanic ethnicity. Median age was 66 and 50 years for EC and BE AUB, respectively; 80% of those with EC and 43% with benign AUB reported being postmenopausal. Among participants with EC, 102 (65%), 17 (11%), 30 (19%), 6 (4%) were stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively; one EC was unstaged. Type 2 EC accounted for 42 (27%) of all EC cases. A 4-MDM panel yielded an AUC of 0.97 (0.96-0.99, 95% CI) for EC; models with 5-8 MDMs gave identical performance. All-stage EC sensitivity was 97, 97, 96, 95, and 92% at specificities ranging from 75, 80, 85, 90, and 95%, respectively. At the 85% (82-88%) specificity threshold, sensitivities across EC stage, type, and age were consistently high (Table). Sensitivity for AH was 33% (10-70%). Conclusions: An MDM panel demonstrated high sensitivity for EC across stage and EC type, supporting the potential for a non-invasive vaginal swab-based test to rule out EC. Future studies are necessary to finalize the panel and algorithm, prior to validating the test. Clinical trial information: NCT06294886 . EC Sensitivity (%, 95% CI) at 85% Specificity All Stages (n=156)* 96 (92-98) Stage I (n=102) 94 (88 - 97)    II (n=17) 100 (82 - 100)    III (n=30) 100 (89 - 100)    IV (n=6) 100 (61 - 100) Type 1 (n=114) 95 (89 - 98)    2 (n=42) 100 (92 -100) Age ≤ 66 yrs (n=86) 95 (89 - 98)   > 66 (n=70) 97 (90 - 99) *n=1 EC was un-staged.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 5624-5624
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

B

Bridget Z. Gagrat

Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI

J

Jamie Nadine Bakkum-Gamez

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

M

Martin Krockenberger

Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI

M

Mark Camardo

Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI

J

John B. Kisiel

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

S

Seth Slettedahl

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

M

Maureen Lemens

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

W

William R. Taylor

S

Shariska Harrington

J

Julia Zella

Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI

E

Elle Kielar-Grevstad

Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI

T

Tomasz M. Beer

Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI

M

Marilyn Olson

Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI