Development and validation of a photogrammetry-based preoperative method (BREAST-E) for quantitative breast morphometric analysis and volume estimation of breast in reconstructive surgery

M Mee Hoong See K Kwan Hoong Ng T Teng Aik Ong L Lai Kuan Wong L Lee Lee Lai S Sheng Pu Teo J Jing Hui Ng J Jia Min Tneoh M Mahmoud Danaee

Abstract

Background The demand for reproducible, reliable, and cost-effective tools regarding preoperative breast surgery planning is significant in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to limited advanced imaging access, insufficient standardisation, and high cost. This study developed the BREAST-E technique for accurate and standardised breast volume analysis. Methodology A photogrammetry method assessed four ptosis levels: (i) no-ptosis, (ii) mild, [Watterson PA, et al. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1995;95:1185–94] moderate, and (iv) severe. Key parameters included marker counts (20, 40, and 60), photo angles (10°, 20°, and 30°), and offset adjustments (−0.01, 0, and +0.01). Two-dimensional (2D) images were converted into 3D models via Photomodeler for volume estimation. Clinical validation involved 12 patients (13 breasts) undergoing mastectomy, comparing estimated breast volumes to mastectomy specimens. The primary endpoint was accuracy of volume estimation compared with mastectomy specimen volume, while secondary endpoints included reliability, agreement, and workflow feasibility. Results The BREAST-E technique yielded promising accuracy [Pearson correlation coefficient ( R ) = 0.899 and mean absolute error (MAE) = 98.12 mL] and encouraging reliability (ICC = 0.995–0.996) across ptosis levels. Bland-Altman analysis indicated negligible bias, while Cronbach’s alpha (reaching 0.994) demonstrated robust internal consistency. Clinical validation also implied strong performance ( R  = 0.789, MAE = 104.69 mL, and mean error = −27.00 mL). Consequently, no-ptosis presented the highest reliability (ICC = 0.81 and Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92) with minimal bias, whereas moderate and severe ptosis levels demonstrated greater variability. Conclusion This study successfully indicated that a reproducible, accessible, and cost-effective method for analysing breast volume was accomplished through the proposed BREAST-E technique for LMICs.

Article Details

Journal PLoS ONE
Volume / Issue Vol. 21, Issue 7
Published July 28, 2026
Pages e0353970
ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science

Journal Info

PLoS ONE

Public Library of Science

ISSN: 1932-6203 Open Access Health Sciences

Authors (9)

M

Mee Hoong See

K

Kwan Hoong Ng

T

Teng Aik Ong

L

Lai Kuan Wong

L

Lee Lee Lai

S

Sheng Pu Teo

J

Jing Hui Ng

J

Jia Min Tneoh

M

Mahmoud Danaee