Developing a pricing model for general medical consultation services among private consulting rooms in Harare, Zimbabwe

C Chengetedzai Gota G Gibson Mandozana R Richard Makurumidze S Shepherd Shamu

Abstract

Background There are often variations around setting tariffs or prices for payment of general medical consultation services between the medical insurance industry, the medical association, and the private health care providers. Differences in these tariffs have an impact on both the public and private health care sectors. The research study aimed to develop a pricing model for consultation services and ascertain the ideal price that should be charged for those services. Materials and methods An analytical cross-sectional study design was utilized to collect data through a questionnaire for the input costs of operating a surgery as well as the consultation fee charged by General Medical practitioners who participated in the study. The recruitment period for this study was from 13 September 2023, to 29 September 2023, during which 170 medical practitioners completed the online questionnaire. Eight independent variables were analyzed in the study using Stata (version 14) to build a multiple linear regression model with the capability of predicting the mean consultation fee. The variables were registration fees, rental, cost of equipment, cost of consumables, salaries, utility costs, number of patients seen and actual profit. Results A total of 170 General Medical Practitioners participated in the study. The variables which met the multiple linear regression assumptions that were included in the model were consumables, salaries, utilities, number of patients seen by doctor and actual profit made by the consulting room. The estimated ideal consultation fee, which was obtained using empirical data from the 170 surgeries sampled was US$23.28. Profit levels varied significantly by both suburb density (p < 0.001) and patient volume (p < 0.001), indicating the importance of geographic and operational factors in practice profitability. Conclusion The developed model aimed to provide a transparent basis for determining consultation fees, thus helping to assure affordability, access, and financial sustainability for both practitioners and patients. However, the model did not consider the value of the training, skills, knowledge and experience of the Medical Practitioner. Therefore, further research is required to come up with a consultation fee that is affordable and sustainable for both practitioners and patients.

Article Details

Journal PLoS ONE
Volume / Issue Vol. 20, Issue 12
Published December 12, 2025
Pages e0324572
ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science

Journal Info

PLoS ONE

Public Library of Science

ISSN: 1932-6203 Open Access Health Sciences

Authors (4)

C

Chengetedzai Gota

G

Gibson Mandozana

R

Richard Makurumidze

S

Shepherd Shamu