Design of Adsorption‒Diffusion Dual‐Driven MOF Membranes for Efficient CO <sub>2</sub> Separation

Y Yawei Gu (State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering) R Rujing Hou (State Key Laboratory of Materials‐Oriented Chemical Engineering College of Chemical Engineering Nanjing Tech University Nanjing 211816 China) Y Yizhen Situ (State Key Laboratory of Organic‐Inorganic Composites College of Chemical Engineering Beijing University of Chemical Technology Beijing China) B Bingbo Shen (State Key Laboratory of Materials‐Oriented Chemical Engineering College of Chemical Engineering Nanjing Tech University Nanjing 211816 China) J Jingxian Hua (State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering) Z Zemin Li (State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering) H Haiqian Lian (State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering) C Chenkai Gu (Suzhou Laboratory Suzhou 215123 China) Q Qingyuan Yang (State Key Laboratory of Organic–Inorganic Composites, College of Chemical Engineering) M Matthew R. Hill (Department of Materials Science and Engineering Monash University Clayton, Victoria 3800 Australia) W Weihong Xing (State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering) Y Yichang Pan (State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering)

Abstract

Abstract Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) offer exceptional tunability in pore structure and functionality, holding considerable potential for advanced gas separation membranes. However, their advancement is restricted by the permeability–selectivity trade‐off and inefficient empirical screening. Herein, we propose an adsorption–diffusion dual‐driven design strategy balancing moderate CO 2 adsorption affinity (1 &lt; α ads,HTCS  &lt; 10) and high CO 2 diffusivity selectivity (α diff,HTCS  &gt; 10) within a pore‐limiting diameter range of 3.8–4.4 Å. This rationale is corroborated by high‐throughput computational screening and experimental membrane performance. Three yfm ‐topology MOF membranes—CAU‐10H, CAU‐10pydc, and KMF‐1 with finely tuned pore microenvironments were synthesized, with the former two meeting the proposed criteria and KMF‐1 serving as a counterexample. As anticipated, CAU‐10H and CAU‐10pydc exceed the 2019 upper bound for CO 2 /CH 4 separation, with CAU‐10pydc exhibiting a remarkable CO 2 permeability of ∼2847 Barrer and a selectivity of 185, outperforming most state‐of‐the‐art membranes. Moreover, despite sharing the same kinetic diameter as CO 2 , C 2 H 2 exhibits 1.5 times higher adsorption affinity, resulting in a significantly lower permeability of only 39 Barrer under the same conditions. These results confirm the adsorption–diffusion dual‐driven design principle, providing both theoretical insight and practical guidance for other challenging gas separation scenarios.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 65, Issue 7
Published February 09, 2026
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (12)

Y

Yawei Gu

State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering

R

Rujing Hou

State Key Laboratory of Materials‐Oriented Chemical Engineering College of Chemical Engineering Nanjing Tech University Nanjing 211816 China

Y

Yizhen Situ

State Key Laboratory of Organic‐Inorganic Composites College of Chemical Engineering Beijing University of Chemical Technology Beijing China

B

Bingbo Shen

State Key Laboratory of Materials‐Oriented Chemical Engineering College of Chemical Engineering Nanjing Tech University Nanjing 211816 China

J

Jingxian Hua

State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering

Z

Zemin Li

State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering

H

Haiqian Lian

State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering

C

Chenkai Gu

Suzhou Laboratory Suzhou 215123 China

Q

Qingyuan Yang

State Key Laboratory of Organic–Inorganic Composites, College of Chemical Engineering

M

Matthew R. Hill

Department of Materials Science and Engineering Monash University Clayton, Victoria 3800 Australia

W

Weihong Xing

State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering

Y

Yichang Pan

State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering