Definitive non-surgical management of locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Abstract
e16143 Background: For patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (LAEA), esophagectomy with perioperative chemo-radiation is the preferred treatment. Esophagectomy, however, is associated with substantial morbidity, with postoperative complication rates approaching 60%. Organ-preserving, esophagectomy-free approaches may reduce treatment-related morbidity but carry a risk of locoregional recurrence. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of esophagectomy-free treatment approaches for LAEA. Methods: A comprehensive PRISMA-guided systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase, yielding 8 clinical trials evaluating non-surgical treatment strategies in patients with LAEA. Data were extracted, and outcomes were pooled using inverse-variance meta-analysis with logit transformation under random-effects models, with heterogeneity quantified by I² in the R statistical package version 4.4.0. Results: A total of 945 patients were included, of whom 76% were male and 24% female, with a median age of 65.5 (58-72) years. Patients had non-metastatic locally advanced stage II–III disease and good baseline functional status (ECOG/WHO/Zubrod 0–1). Patients were treated with cetuximab plus chemoradiation (CRT) = 413, CRT with weekly carboplatin+paclitaxel = 129, induction chemotherapy (IC) + CRT = 51, pembrolizumab plus CRT = 40, XELOX followed by CRT = 19, IC + radiotherapy (RT) = 17, definitive CRT = 12, definitive RT = 8, and celecoxib plus CRT = 7. The median follow-up period was 22.3 (16-46) months. The pooled complete response rate was 41% (95% CI, 24–60%; I² = 93.3%), and the pooled overall response rate was 42% (95% CI, 32–53%). Pooled 2-and 3-year overall survival rates were 45% (95% CI, 40-49%) and 36% (95% CI, 29-45%; I² = 75.7%), respectively. Median OS was 19.3 (16-47) months. The pooled 2-year PFS was 32% (95% CI, 7-74%; I² = 82.2%), with a median PFS of 11.8 (8.8-24.1) months. Pooled rates of locoregional and distant progression were 41% (95% CI, 33–49%; I² = 65.7%) and 36% (95% CI, 25–48%; I² = 79.1%), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were variably reported; common grade ≥3 toxicities included hematologic events, pneumonitis, esophagitis, dysphagia, diarrhea, fatigue, and dehydration. The pooled incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia was 12% (95% CI, 6–22%; I² = 72.5%). Conclusions: Esophagectomy-free treatment strategies demonstrate meaningful clinical activity with acceptable toxicity in selected patients with LAEA. These approaches may offer a viable organ-preserving alternative to standard therapy. Prospective randomized trials are needed to better define patient selection, optimize surveillance strategies, and compare long-term outcomes with surgical approaches.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (10)
Zobia Farooq
King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
Sumbal Aziz
1AdventHealth Sebring, Internal Medicine Residency, Sebring, United States
Muhammad Mohsin Sial
2Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
Hassan Awais
Conway Medical Center, Conway, SC
Osama Ewidat
Nuha Riyad
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestinian Territories (West Bank and Gaza)
Muzammil Khan
Muhammad Kashif Amin
2The Mikael Rayaan Foundation Global Research Training Institute (MRF GRTI), Kansas City, United States
Muhammad Umair Mushtaq
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
Moazzam Shahzad
10H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States