Definitive bladder/pelvic radiation after enfortumab vedotin–pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Abstract
e16589 Background: Treatment with enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab (EV-P) is highly effective in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma. The optimal local therapy for residual or oligoprogressive disease in the bladder after EV-P remains to be defined. Radiation (RT) to the bladder is highly effective in appropriately selected pts with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Here, we report outcomes for pts receiving definitive bladder or pelvic RT after EV-P. Methods: A retrospective institutional database of pts treated with EV-P (n = 256) was reviewed to identify pts who received bladder or pelvic RT. RT-intent (consolidative, oligoprogressive, palliative) was coded. Investigator-assessed local control (LC), defined by recurrence at a RT-treated site, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated from RT start. Treatment-related toxicity was retrospectively graded using CTCAE both acutely (within 3m of RT) and at 6-month intervals. Results: 36 pts received EV-P and RT to the bladder/pelvis. 24 were treated with definitive intent (for oligoprogression on/after EV-P or to consolidate non-growing residual disease). 7 were excluded from further analysis for RT given before EV-P, after intervening therapy, or > 1 year after EV-P. For the remaining 17 pts, 10 were treated for oligoprogression and 7 to consolidate residual disease. At diagnosis, 5 had M1b disease, 7 were M1a, 4 were N+M0, and 1 had N0M0 MIBC. Median follow-up was 11.7m. The median total duration of EV-P treatment was 4.1 months. All pts held EV during RT. RT was delivered to the bladder (n = 12, 4 with nodal coverage) or pelvic LNs alone (n = 5 patients); 7/17 received concurrent chemotherapy (all gemcitabine). After RT, 7/17 continued EV and/or P. LC at 12 and 24 months was 75%. 4/17 (24%) had local failure in the RT field at any time. After RT, median LC, PFS, and OS were 32.1 (95% CI NR-NR), 8.1 (95%CI 3.9-NR) and not reached (NR) (95%CI 11.9-NR) months. Median LC, PFS, and OS were not met for the consolidation patients and were 32.1, 3.9 and 11.9 months for oligoprogression pts. There were no Grade 3+ GU and 1 grade 3+ GI toxicities (a colo-vesical fistula in the context of disease progression with colonic invasion). Conclusions: Definitive bladder-pelvic RT after EV-P was well-tolerated with promising disease control, particularly in those patients receiving RT for residual non-progressing disease. Clinical outcomes and follow-up summary. Cohort Local Control Progression-Free Overall Survival All Patients 32.1 [NR to NR] 8.1 [3.9 to NR] NR [11.9 to NR] Consolidative NR [NR to NR] NR [NR to NR] NR [NR to NR] Oligoprogression 32.1 [NR to NR] 3.9 [2.2 to NR] 11.9 [8.4 to NR] NR: Not Reached; Values are Median [95% Confidence Interval] in months.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (16)
Andrew Bacotti
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Michal Sternschuss
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Alyssa Arbuiso
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Daniel Gorovets
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Sean Matthew McBride
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Ashley M. Regazzi
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Scot Anthony Niglio
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Daniel E. Lage
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Marisa Kollmeier
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Aditi Gupta
Gopa Iyer
Samuel A. Funt
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Jonathan E. Rosenberg
Genitourinary Oncology Service Department of Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA
David H. Aggen
Himanshu Nagar
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Eric Huttenlocher Bent
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY