DDAVP response and its determinants in bleeding disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

S Sebastiaan Laan (1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden Universiteit Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands) J Jessica Del Castillo Alferez (3Department of Molecular Hemostasis, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) S Suzanne Cannegieter (1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden Universiteit Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands) K Karin Fijnvandraat M Marieke Kruip (2Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) S Saskia le Cessie R Ruben Bierings (1Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) J Jeroen Eikenboom (18Division of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands) I Iris van Moort (2Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Abstract Desmopressin (1-desamino-8-d-arginine vasopressin [DDAVP]) can be used to prevent or stop bleeding. However, large interindividual variability is observed in DDAVP response and determinants are largely unknown. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to identify the response to DDAVP and the factors that determine DDAVP response in patients. We included studies with patients with any bleeding disorder receiving DDAVP. First and second screening round and risk of bias assessment were performed by independent reviewers. The main outcome was proportion of patients with complete (factor level >50 U/dL) or partial (30-50 U/dL) response to DDAVP. Determinants of response including disease type, age, sex, von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII) mutations, and baseline factor levels were investigated. In total, 591 articles were found and 103 were included. Of these, 71 articles (1772 patients) were suitable for the study’s definition of response. Meta-analysis showed a pooled response proportion of 0.71 (0.64; 0.78) and a significant difference in response between disease subtypes. For hemophilia A, baseline FVIII activity (FVIII:C) was a borderline significant determinant of response. In patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) type 1, VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF activity, and FVIII:C were significant determinants. A large variation in response was observed for specific mutations in VWF and FVIII. Response to DDAVP varied between disease subtypes and was largely determined by the baseline levels of FVIII:C for hemophilia A and VWF:Ag for VWD. Our findings highlight the significant differences in response and emphasize the need for a standardized response definition and further research into response mechanisms.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 145, Issue 16
Published April 17, 2025
Pages 1814-1825
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (9)

S

Sebastiaan Laan

1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden Universiteit Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands

J

Jessica Del Castillo Alferez

3Department of Molecular Hemostasis, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

S

Suzanne Cannegieter

1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden Universiteit Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands

K

Karin Fijnvandraat

M

Marieke Kruip

2Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

S

Saskia le Cessie

R

Ruben Bierings

1Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

J

Jeroen Eikenboom

18Division of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

I

Iris van Moort

2Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands