Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer: Updated results from the phase 1 TROPIONPanTumor01 study.
Abstract
663 Background: Dato-DXd is a TROP2-directed antibody-drug conjugate under investigation in various solid tumor types. We report updated results in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (la/m UC) from the ongoing phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 study (NCT03401385). Methods: Pts with unresectable la/m UC (stage III/IV) treated with ≥1 prior line of therapy, including an immune checkpoint inhibitor, received Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg Q3W. Primary study objectives were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Results: At data cutoff (April 22, 2024), 40 pts had received Dato-DXd; 8 (20%) were receiving ongoing treatment. Median follow-up was 10.0 (range 5–28) months (mo). Pts were heavily pretreated: 24 (60%) had received ≥3 prior regimens in the locally advanced/metastatic setting, 36 (90%) received prior platinum chemotherapy, and 33 (83%) received prior enfortumab vedotin. Confirmed ORR by investigator was 27.5% (95% CI, 14.6–43.9), including 11 partial responses (PR). Confirmed ORR by BICR was 25.0% (95% CI, 12.7–41.2), including 1 complete response (CR) and 9 PR (Table). Median DOR was not reached (95% CI, 2.6–not evaluable [NE]); 76.2% (95% CI, 33.2–93.5) of responders had ongoing responses at 6 mo. Median PFS by BICR was 6.9 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9–NE). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring in >20% of pts (any grade; grade ≥3) were stomatitis (53%; 5%), nausea (38%; 3%), decreased appetite (30%; 3%), and fatigue (28%; 0%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 55% of pts. TEAEs associated with treatment discontinuation, dose reduction, and dose interruption occurred in 8%, 20%, and 35% of pts, respectively. No serious treatment-related AEs or treatment-related grade 4 or 5 AEs were reported. Two pts (5%) had adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (grade 2 and 3). Conclusions: In heavily pretreated pts with la/m UC, Dato-DXd demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile. Dato-DXd is being evaluated in pts with urothelial cancer in the phase 1/2 TROPION-PanTumor02 (NCT05460273) and the phase 2 TROPION-PanTumor03 (NCT05489211) studies. Clinical trial information: NCT03401385 . Efficacy by BICR. Response All patients N=40 Confirmed ORR, n (%) [95% CI] 10 (25.0) [12.7–41.2] CR 1 (2.5) PR 9 (22.5) SD 20 (50.0) Non-CR/non-PD 1 (2.5) PD 5 (12.5) NE 4 (10.0) DOR at 6 mo, % [95% CI] 76.2 [33.2–93.5] Median PFS, mo [95% CI] 6.9 [2.9–NE] BICR, blinded independent central review; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; DOR, duration of response; mo, months; NE, not evaluable; ORR, objective response rate; PD, progressive disease; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (17)
Funda Meric-Bernstam
Omar Alhalabi
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Aaron Lisberg
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
Alexandra Drakaki
Benjamin Garmezy
Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN
Takahiro Kogawa
Department of Advanced Medical Development, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
Alexander I. Spira
Virginia Cancer Specialists and NEXT Oncology-Virginia, Fairfax
Mohamad Adham Salkeni
Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA
Xin Gao
Anthony W. Tolcher
NEXT Oncology, San Antonio, TX
Manali A. Bhave
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Deborah Blythe Doroshow
Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
Jeannie Hoffman-Censits
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...
Gunnar Klauss
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ
Yoshiaki Kaga
Clinical Science, Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ
Yasuyuki Kakurai
Data Intelligence, Daiichi Sankyo, Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
Takahiro Kojima