CTC and AR-V7 analysis in the ECOG-ACRIN 8153 (CHAARTED2) randomized trial: Abiraterone (Abi) with or without cabazitaxel (Abi-Cabazi) in extensive mCRPC following docetaxel.

C Christos Kyriakopoulos (University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States) Y Yu-Hui Chen (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) R Robert Jeraj F Fenghai Duan (20ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistical Center, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI) A Abhishek Tripathi (Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Duarte California USA) D David Kosoff R Rohan Garje (3Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, United States) R Russell Kent Pachynski (Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) R Rahul Atul Parikh (University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS) A Andrea Harzstark (Department of Hematology-Oncology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) N Nabil Adra (Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN) B Benjamin L. Maughan (University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT) Y Yousef Zakharia (Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA) P Paul Gettys Corn (Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) G Glenn Liu (University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI) M Michael A Carducci (The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) J Jun Luo E Emmanuel S. Antonarakis (Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota)

Abstract

181 Background: The CHAARTED2 trial showed improved PFS with Abi-Cabazi over Abi-alone in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who previously received docetaxel for metastatic castration-sensitive disease. Here, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive impact of CTC and AR-V7 circulating biomarkers. Methods: The modified AdnaTest (Qiagen) was used to define CTC detection (+ vs –) and AR-V7 detection (+ vs –) at baseline, C5D1, as well as at the time of progression. We first assessed the prognostic value of baseline and C5D1 CTC and AR-V7 status in the two arms. We also assessed the predictive potential of baseline and C5D1 CTC and AR-V7 status to explore if these biomarkers may aid in treatment selection. Logrank test and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess for associations between clinical outcomes and baseline biomarker status. Landmark analysis was performed to evaluate associations at C5D1. Results: A total of 223 pts were randomized between the two arms. CTC data were evaluable for 94/112 and 94/111 pts in the Abi-alone and Abi-Cabazi arms, respectively. Baseline CTC detection was prognostic for worse PFS in both the Abi-alone (7.1 vs 31.7 months, HR 3.64, P <0.001) and the Abi-Cabazi (9.6 vs 36.9 months, HR 4.13, P <0.001) arms. Likewise, baseline AR-V7 detection portended worse PFS in the Abi-alone (4.1 vs 12.8 months, HR 3.34, P <0.001) and the Abi-Cabazi (6.9 vs 15.1 months, HR 3.17, P <0.001) arms. At C5D1, there was a higher rate of CTC(-) conversion (60 vs 46%) and AR-V7(-) conversion (69 vs 58%) in the Abi-Cabazi arm. CTC(-) and AR-V7(-) status at C5D1 was prognostic of improved PFS in both arms (all P ≤0.02). In terms of predictive impact, PFS was numerically but not statistically longer in the Abi-Cabazi arm in all biomarker groups; the greatest relative PFS benefit to Abi-Cabazi was in the baseline AR-V7(+) group (HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.36–1.3, P =0.2). Similarly, at C5D1, the greatest relative PFS benefit to Abi-Cabazi was in pts remaining AR-V7(+) (HR 0.57, 95%CI 0.15–2.16, P =0.4). Conclusions: Baseline CTC and AR-V7 detection were both prognostic for inferior PFS in both study arms. PFS outcomes were broadly longer in the Abi-Cabazi vs Abi-alone arm in all biomarker groups. The presence of AR-V7 at baseline and at C5D1 was the strongest relative predictor of Abi-Cabazi benefit, but did not meet statistical significance. Clinical trial information: NCT03419234 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 181-181
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (18)

C

Christos Kyriakopoulos

University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Y

Yu-Hui Chen

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

R

Robert Jeraj

F

Fenghai Duan

20ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistical Center, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI

A

Abhishek Tripathi

Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Duarte California USA

D

David Kosoff

R

Rohan Garje

3Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, United States

R

Russell Kent Pachynski

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

R

Rahul Atul Parikh

University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS

A

Andrea Harzstark

Department of Hematology-Oncology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

N

Nabil Adra

Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN

B

Benjamin L. Maughan

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Y

Yousef Zakharia

Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA

P

Paul Gettys Corn

Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

G

Glenn Liu

University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

M

Michael A Carducci

The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

J

Jun Luo

E

Emmanuel S. Antonarakis

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota