Creation, stabilization, and investigation at ambient pressure of pressure-induced superconductivity in Bi <sub>0.5</sub> Sb <sub>1.5</sub> Te <sub>3</sub>
Abstract
In light of breakthroughs in superconductivity under high pressure, and considering that record critical temperatures (T c s) across various systems have been achieved under high pressure, the primary challenge for higher T c should no longer solely be to increase T c under extreme conditions but also to reduce, or ideally eliminate, the need for applied pressure in retaining pressure-induced or -enhanced superconductivity. The topological semiconductor Bi 0.5 Sb 1.5 Te 3 (BST) was chosen to demonstrate our approach to addressing this challenge and exploring its intriguing physics. Under pressures up to ~50 GPa, three superconducting phases (BST-I, -II, and -III) were observed. A superconducting phase in BST-I appears at ~4 GPa, without a structural transition, suggesting the possible topological nature of this phase. Using the pressure-quench protocol (PQP) recently developed by us, we successfully retained this pressure-induced phase at ambient pressure and revealed the bulk nature of the state. Significantly, this demonstrates recovery of a pressure-quenched sample from a diamond anvil cell at room temperature with the pressure-induced phase retained at ambient pressure. Other superconducting phases were retained in BST-II and -III at ambient pressure and subjected to thermal and temporal stability testing. Superconductivity was also found in BST with T c up to 10.2 K, the record for this compound series. While PQP maintains superconducting phases in BST at ambient pressure, both depressurization and PQP enhance its T c , possibly due to microstructures formed during these processes, offering an added avenue to raise T c . These findings are supported by our density-functional theory calculations.
Article Details
Journal Info
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
Authors (16)
Liangzi Deng
Department of Physics and Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston
Busheng Wang
Department of Chemistry, University at Buffalo
Clayton Halbert
Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois Chicago
Daniel J. Schulze
Department of Physics and Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston
Melissa Gooch
Department of Physics and Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston
Trevor Bontke
Department of Physics and Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston
Ting-Wei Kuo
Department of Physics and Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston
Xin Shi
Chemistry Program, Physical Science and Engineering Division (PSE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Shaowei Song
Department of Physics and Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston
Nilesh Salke
Department of Physics, University of Illinois Chicago
Hung-Duen Yang
Department of Physics, National Sun Yet-Sen University
Zhifeng Ren
Department of Physics and Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston
Russell J. Hemley
Department of Physics, University of Illinois Chicago
Eva Zurek
Department of Chemistry, State University of New York at Buffalo, 777 Natural Science Complex, Buffalo, New York 14260-3000, United States
Rohit P. Prasankumar
Ching-Wu Chu
Department of Physics and Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston