Creating a responsible authorship culture in science: Anchoring authorship practices in principles of transparency, credit, and accountability

V Véronique Kiermer S Sofia Adams (Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania) K Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo Y Yensi Flores Bueso (Cancer Research, University College Cork) K Kathleen Hall Jamieson (Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania) J Joerg Heber (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) M Mohammad Hosseini A Ana Marušić (Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health and Center for Evidence-based Medicine, University of Split School of Medicine) B Beau Nielsen (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine) M Magdalena Skipper G Geeta K. Swamy (Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine) S Susan M. Wolf (University of Minnesota Law School and Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School)

Abstract

Authorship remains the primary currency of academic credit and a cornerstone of research integrity, yet current practices often fail to reflect the collaborative and interdisciplinary nature of modern science and questionable authorship practices persist. We argue that addressing these shortcomings is a collective responsibility shared by researchers, journals, research funders, scholarly societies, and research institutions. We examined authorship guidelines issued by journals and research institutions and found that their recommendations to researchers are highly variable. We propose that fostering a responsible authorship culture requires a shared, principle-based framework grounded in transparency, credit, and accountability. These three interconnected principles highlight when authorship practices are questionable and offer a framework for constructive reflection on the meaning of authorship. We outline practical ways research leaders can embed these principles into everyday practice by initiating early, inclusive, and fair authorship discussions and ensuring transparent description of contributions. Research institutions have a unique opportunity to inculcate good practices and lead this culture change with harmonized guidance, education, fair conflict resolution, and reform of researcher assessment. Anchoring authorship in transparency, credit, and accountability will strengthen the credibility of individual research, the fairness of recognition systems, and, ultimately, the trustworthiness of science itself.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 123, Issue 12
Published March 24, 2026
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (12)

V

Véronique Kiermer

S

Sofia Adams

Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania

K

Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo

Y

Yensi Flores Bueso

Cancer Research, University College Cork

K

Kathleen Hall Jamieson

Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania

J

Joerg Heber

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

M

Mohammad Hosseini

A

Ana Marušić

Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health and Center for Evidence-based Medicine, University of Split School of Medicine

B

Beau Nielsen

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

M

Magdalena Skipper

G

Geeta K. Swamy

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine

S

Susan M. Wolf

University of Minnesota Law School and Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School