Cost-effectiveness of a mentalisation-based treatment for antisocial personality disorder in males convicted of an offence on community probation in England and Wales: Multicentre, assessor-blind randomised controlled trial

B Barbara Barrett E Elizabeth Simes K Karen Yirmiya J James M. S. Wason A Alison Frater A Angus Cameron S Stephen Butler Z Zoe Hoare M Mary McMurran P Paul Moran M Mike Crawford S Stephen Pilling E Elizabeth Allison J Jessica Yakeley A Anthony Bateman P Peter Fonagy

Abstract

This study addresses a critical gap in the evidence base for cost-effective psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) in forensic settings by presenting a full trial-based economic evaluation of mentalisation-based treatment plus probation as usual (MBT-ASPD + PAU), compared to PAU alone, for males with ASPD convicted of an offence in England and Wales. The economic evaluation adopted a societal perspective, incorporating costs to health care, the criminal justice system, and the wider societal impact of offending. Outcomes were assessed 24 months post-randomisation. The primary cost–utility analysis compared costs with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from the EQ-5D-5L, while a secondary cost-effectiveness analysis compared costs with aggression outcomes measured by the Overt Aggression Scale – Modified (OAS-M). Although missing data limited definitive conclusions regarding service use, available data suggest that participants in the PAU group spent more time in custody than those in the MBT-ASPD + PAU group. Utility scores and quality of life showed minimal variation over follow-up, with no significant differences between groups. Overall costs were lower in the MBT-ASPD + PAU group, though not statistically significant. Over the 24-month period, MBT-ASPD + PAU was associated with both reduced costs and lower aggression (as reflected in OAS-M scores), indicating that each unit reduction in aggression yielded a cost saving of approximately £93. For QALYs, MBT-ASPD + PAU appeared cost-effective compared to PAU across all values a decision-maker may be willing to pay for improvements in outcome. These findings provide preliminary evidence for the potential economic value of MBT-ASPD + PAU in a forensic ASPD population, particularly in relation to aggression reduction and the associated cost savings. Trial registration This trial is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN 32309003).

Article Details

Journal PLoS ONE
Volume / Issue Vol. 21, Issue 7
Published July 22, 2026
Pages e0352865
ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science

Journal Info

PLoS ONE

Public Library of Science

ISSN: 1932-6203 Open Access Health Sciences

Authors (16)

B

Barbara Barrett

E

Elizabeth Simes

K

Karen Yirmiya

J

James M. S. Wason

A

Alison Frater

A

Angus Cameron

S

Stephen Butler

Z

Zoe Hoare

M

Mary McMurran

P

Paul Moran

M

Mike Crawford

S

Stephen Pilling

E

Elizabeth Allison

J

Jessica Yakeley

A

Anthony Bateman

P

Peter Fonagy