Correlation of adverse events (AEs) and clinical outcomes in first-line enfortumab vedotin–pembrolizumab (EVP) treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (La/mUC).
Abstract
717 Background: Neuropathy and rash are the most common AEs with EVP. Their association with clinical outcomes in standard-of-care settings remains unclear. We hypothesized that these AEs may be associated with improved survival. Methods: We reviewed our institutional database of patients with La/mUC treated with first-line EVP (March 2022–July 2025). AEs and grades were extracted from provider notes; missing grades were inferred per CTCAE v5. Kaplan–Meier and time-dependent Cox regression analyses were performed, modeling AEs as time-dependent variables to account for immortal-time bias and variable onset. OS was measured from EVP initiation to death or last follow-up. Results: Among 185 patients, 141 (76%) were male, and 95 (48%) had de novo metastatic disease. Urinary bladder primary and pure urothelial histology were seen in 129 (70%) and 123 (66%), respectively. Baseline details are listed in the Table. At a median follow up of 9.7 months (95%CI: 8.2-11.9), any grade of rash and neuropathy was reported in 71 (38%) and 51 (28%) patients, at median onset of 0.4 (IQR 0.2-0.9) months and 3.2 (IQR: 2.3-4.4) months respectively. Both were reported in 26 (14%) patients. Grade 3/4 rash and neuropathy were reported in 8 (4.3%) and 1 (0.5%) patient respectively. One Grade 5 rash was reported. All but one Grade ≥3 rash developed within 2 weeks of initiation. EV dose reduction occurred in 83 (45%), most commonly for neuropathy (25, 30.1%) and rash (17, 20.4%). Discontinuation of EV alone, P alone, and both drugs was seen in 30 (16%), 5 (2.7%), and 21 (11%), respectively. Median OS for the cohort was 36.5 months (17.5–not reached). OS was longer in patients with neuropathy vs no neuropathy (36.5 vs 17.6 months; HR 0.46, 95%CI 0.21–1.04; p = 0.06) and rash vs no rash (not reached vs 17.5 months; HR 0.34, 95%CI 0.17–0.68; p = 0.002). After adjusting for prior neuropathy (only for neuropathy analysis), liver metastases, ECOG, starting dose, and time on EV, neuropathy and rash were associated with OS HRs of 0.54 (95%CI 0.24–1.24; p = 0.14) and 0.42 (95%CI 0.20–0.86; p = 0.02), respectively. Conclusions: The prevalence and timing of neuropathy and rash observed in our cohort are consistent with major trials of EVP in La/mUC, underscoring the reproducibility of these safety findings. In first-line EVP-treated La/mUC, these hypothesis-generating findings suggest susceptibility to AEs may correlate with survival benefit. Alternative explanations include germline variation in payload metabolism. Limitations include small numbers, short follow-up, retrospective collection, and potential residual immortal-time bias despite modelling. n (%) (Total N=185) Baseline ECOG > 0 113 (61) Baseline neuropathy 38 (21) Liver Metastases 37 (20) Starting EV Dose- 1.25/1/0.75/0.5 mg/kg 145(78)/ 26(14)/ 13(7)/ 1(0.5) Median EV doses received 7 (IQR: 3-12)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (18)
Zachariah Thomas
Cindy Y. Jiang
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Patrick Speck
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Mohammad Jad Moussa
Internal Medicine Residency Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
Emanuele Crupi
Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Milan, Italy
Jianjun Gao
Monica Dandona Desai
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Amishi Yogesh Shah
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Sangeeta Goswami
Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Andrew Johns
Michael Glover
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Christopher Logothetis
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Pavlos Msaouel
Ashley Aaroe
Anisha B Patel
Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Matthew T. Campbell
Omar Alhalabi
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX