COPERNICUS, a pragmatic phase 2b study of subcutaneous (SC) amivantamab (ami) + chemotherapy (chemo) with enhanced dermatologic adverse event (AE) prophylaxis in <i>EGFR</i> -mutated advanced NSCLC: Interim results.

T Ticiana Leal B Balazs Halmos N Narjust Florez (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) W Wade Thomas Iams (Greco-Hainsworth Centers for Research, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN) M Melissa Lynne Johnson (Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN) S Sarah B. Goldberg X Xiuning Le (Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA) S Sonam Puri D Danny Nguyen L Luis E. Raez (Memorial Cancer Institute, Pembroke Pines, FL) J Jonathan W. Riess J Joshua K. Sabari (Division of Medical Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York) D Dave Bjork (The Research Evangelist Podcast, Georgetown, MA) N Nichelle Stigger (LUNGevity Foundation, Chicago, IL) R Ronald Tang (LA Cancer Network, Pasadena, CA) K Karen Xia (Johnson &amp; Johnson, Wayne, PA) P Paul Cifuentes (Johnson &amp; Johnson, Horsham, PA) F Farah Shanoon (Johnson &amp; Johnson, Horsham, PA) I Illse Leipoldt (Johnson &amp; Johnson, Durban North, South Africa) K Kartik Konduri (SCRI at Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX)

Abstract

8614 Background: In MARIPOSA-2, intravenous ami + carboplatin-pemetrexed chemo significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs chemo (HR, 0.48; P &lt;0.001) in participants (pts) with EGFR -mutated (exon 19 deletion [Ex19del]/L858R) advanced NSCLC after progression on osimertinib. However, longer infusion times, infusion-related reactions (59%), and dermatologic AEs (paronychia [37%], rash [43%]) were observed, with frequent interruptions of ami due to AEs (60%) as a potential result. Numerous studies have since tested ways to optimize ami administration. PALOMA-3/-2 showed reductions in administration-related reactions (ARRs) and administration time with SC ami coformulated with hyaluronidase (rHuPH20), thus enhancing patient experience and leading to approval by the FDA/EMA. COCOON also showed fewer grade ≥2 dermatologic AEs vs standard of care with an enhanced prophylactic regimen. Methods: COPERNICUS (NCT06667076) is the first study to combine SC ami and optimized supportive care, using a pragmatic design to broaden the pt population and better resemble real-world usage. We report planned interim results of Cohort 2 for SC ami every 3 weeks (Q3W) + chemo on/after EGFR TKI progression in US pts with EGFR Ex19del/L858R NSCLC receiving dermatologic AE prophylaxis aligned with the regimen described in COCOON. Pragmatic design included partnering with academic/community sites and less stringent eligibility criteria to enhance pt diversity. Primary endpoint is PFS by investigator. Key secondary endpoints are overall response rate (ORR) and safety, including incidence/severity of dermatologic AEs and ARRs. All comparisons to MARIPOSA-2 are descriptive. Results: As of data cutoff (02 Jan 2026), 29 pts had enrolled in Cohort 2 (target enrollment, 30; median [range] follow-up: 7.6 [0.5+–10.2] mo); 76% were still ongoing in the study. Median age was 62 y, with 45% of pts ≥65 y and 21% ≥75 y; 38% were Asian and 7% African American. Median PFS was 7.4 mo (95% CI, 4.8–NE; Table). AEs were mostly grade 1–2, with no new safety signals; 31% of pts interrupted ami due to AEs. With dermatologic prophylaxis, paronychia and rash occurred in 24% and 14% of pts, respectively, showing numerical reductions vs MARIPOSA-2. ARRs (grouped term) were also numerically lower at 21%. Conclusions: Compared with MARIPOSA-2, SC ami and dermatologic prophylaxis in COPERNICUS led to substantial reductions in ARRs, dermatologic AEs, and ami interruptions, establishing the positive effect of early supportive care interventions. These interim data obtained using a pragmatic design support wide use of SC ami Q3W + chemo post-EGFR TKI progression in a diverse population. Clinical trial information: NCT06667076 . Median PFS, mo (95% CI) 7.4 (4.8–NE) ORR (95% CI) 24.1% (10.3–43.5) Partial response 7 (24.1%) Stable disease 15 (51.7%) Progressive disease 2 (6.9%)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 8614-8614
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

T

Ticiana Leal

B

Balazs Halmos

N

Narjust Florez

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

W

Wade Thomas Iams

Greco-Hainsworth Centers for Research, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN

M

Melissa Lynne Johnson

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN

S

Sarah B. Goldberg

X

Xiuning Le

Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

S

Sonam Puri

D

Danny Nguyen

L

Luis E. Raez

Memorial Cancer Institute, Pembroke Pines, FL

J

Jonathan W. Riess

J

Joshua K. Sabari

Division of Medical Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York

D

Dave Bjork

The Research Evangelist Podcast, Georgetown, MA

N

Nichelle Stigger

LUNGevity Foundation, Chicago, IL

R

Ronald Tang

LA Cancer Network, Pasadena, CA

K

Karen Xia

Johnson &amp; Johnson, Wayne, PA

P

Paul Cifuentes

Johnson &amp; Johnson, Horsham, PA

F

Farah Shanoon

Johnson &amp; Johnson, Horsham, PA

I

Illse Leipoldt

Johnson &amp; Johnson, Durban North, South Africa

K

Kartik Konduri

SCRI at Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX