Contemporary analysis of the prognostic significance of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P).
Abstract
126 Background: IDC-P has become increasingly recognized for its poor prognosis among histologic subtypes. While prior studies have linked IDC-P with higher grade and advanced stage, population-level data remain limited. We utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify national treatment patterns and evaluate the overall survival (OS) of IDC-P compared with acinar adenocarcinoma. Methods: The NCDB was queried from 2004 to 2021 for PCa patients with adenocarcinoma or IDC-P. Patient and tumor characteristics and treatment utilization were compared. Temporal trends in IDC-P were analyzed. OS was compared with Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, log-rank, and Cox Proportional Hazards model, adjusting for demographics, stage, comorbidities, Gleason Group, and treatment. Results: Of 2,107,942 PCa patients, 4,242 (0.2%) had IDC-P histology. IDC-P diagnoses increased over time (OR 1.06 per year, p<0.001), particularly after WHO recognition in 2016 (47.9% vs 36.8%, p<0.001). IDC-P patients had higher utilization of radical prostatectomy (RP) (69.5% vs 47.2%), pelvic lymph node dissection (50.2% vs 30.7%), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (35.7% vs 25.0%), and chemotherapy (3.4% vs 1.2%) (all p<0.001). Adjuvant (5.9% vs 3.0%) and salvage radiotherapy (3.3% vs 1.6%), serving as surrogate markers of biochemical recurrence, were also more common (p<0.001) as defined by < and ≥6 months post-RP, respectively. IDC-P patients had worse OS overall (14.1 vs 16.5 years, p<0.001), though the difference was attenuated in localized disease (cT1–4N0M0; 16.3 vs 16.7 years, p<0.001). After adjustment for comorbidities, stage, grade, and treatment, IDC-P was not independently associated with higher mortality. Conclusions: Our population-level analysis confirmed that IDC-P is associated with a more aggressive clinical phenotype. Despite this, we found that oncologic outcomes did not differ once disease severity and treatment were accounted for. Guideline-concordant management remains appropriate, though the rising detection of IDC-P and its biologic underpinnings merit ongoing investigation. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Variable (Reference) aHR (95%CI) p-value Age (cont.) 1.048 (1.042-1.053) <0.001 Histo (Ref = Adenocarcinoma) Intraductal Carcinoma 1.138 (0.638-1.967) 0.644 Gleason Group (Ref = 1) 2 3 4 5 1.088 (0.883-1.341)1.290 (1.045-1.594)1.533 (1.239-1.897)2.081 (1.690-2.563) 0.4300.018<0.001<0.001 cT (Ref = 0-1) 2+ 1.458 (1.332-1.596) <0.001 cN (Ref = 0) 1+ 1.272 (1.149-1.408) <0.001 cM (Ref = 0) 1 2.969 (2.692-3.276) <0.001 Definitive Tx (Ref = No Surgery) Surgery Alone Surgery, XRT within 6 months Surgery, XRT after ≥6 months 0.474 (0.412-0.546)0.310 (0.199-0.482)0.360 (0.223-0.582) <0.001<0.001<0.001 Hormone Therapy (Ref = No) Yes 0.901 (0.799-1.016) 0.088 Chemotherapy (Ref = No) Yes 1.198 (1.044-1.376) <0.001
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (4)
Ryan Michael Antar
George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
Vincent Eric Xu
George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
Neil Mendhiratta
George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
Michael Joseph Whalen
George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC