Condensation vs cavitation in water: A simulation study

M M. Camarillo (Departamento de Química Física, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid 1 , 28040 Madrid,) I I. Sanchez-Burgos (Maxwell Centre, Cavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge 3 , J J Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE,) C C. P. Lamas (Departamento de Química Física, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid 1 , 28040 Madrid,) P Pablo Montero de Hijes (Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna 2 , A-1090 Vienna,) J J. R. Espinosa (Departamento Química Física I (Unidad Asociada de I+D+i al CSIC), Fac. Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid 1 , 28040 Madrid,) E E. Sanz (Departamento de Química Física, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid 1 , 28040 Madrid,)

Abstract

Condensation and cavitation in water play a crucial role in industry and atmospheric science. We employ molecular dynamics to investigate and compare both nucleation phenomena at 450 and 550 K, taking cavitation data mostly from our recent study [Lamas et al., J. Chem. Phys. 158, 124504 (2023)]. We obtain interfacial free energies across a wide range of supersaturation through direct coexistence, seeding, and, using a novel approach, also through spontaneous nucleation simulations. The consistency between these methods supports the validity of Classical Nucleation Theory even for nuclei as small as two molecular diameters in radius. Condensation at 550 K occurs several orders of magnitude faster than at 450 K due to the lower interfacial free energy. Unlike Lennard-Jones systems [Sanchez-Burgos et al., Phys. Rev. E 102, 062609 (2020)], cavitation and condensation are not governed by the same interfacial free energy trend. For condensation, interfacial free energy is nearly constant at 550 K and increases slightly at 450 K with nucleus size. For cavitation, in contrast, it decreases at both temperatures, leading to a higher cavitation rate. The kinetic pre-factor, influenced by the parent-phase density, further enhances the cavitation nucleation rate. Finally, the orientational ordering of interfacial molecules weakens with temperature and curvature, but no clear link between molecular structure and interfacial free energy is found. Our findings provide a comprehensive perspective on the thermodynamic and molecular factors governing nucleation in water, bridging the mechanisms of condensation and cavitation across different temperatures.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 163, Issue 4
Published July 28, 2025
ISSN 0021-9606
Publisher American Institute of Physics

Journal Info

The Journal of Chemical Physics

American Institute of Physics

ISSN: 0021-9606 Physical Sciences

Authors (6)

M

M. Camarillo

Departamento de Química Física, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid 1 , 28040 Madrid,

I

I. Sanchez-Burgos

Maxwell Centre, Cavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge 3 , J J Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE,

C

C. P. Lamas

Departamento de Química Física, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid 1 , 28040 Madrid,

P

Pablo Montero de Hijes

Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna 2 , A-1090 Vienna,

J

J. R. Espinosa

Departamento Química Física I (Unidad Asociada de I+D+i al CSIC), Fac. Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid 1 , 28040 Madrid,

E

E. Sanz

Departamento de Química Física, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid 1 , 28040 Madrid,