Concordance of Ki-67 index and histologic grade between biopsy and surgical specimens in breast cancer: Implications of treatment decision-making.

L Luiz Gustavo Torres (IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil) G Gerusa BIAGIONE Tiburzio (IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil) R Ruana MOURA Rocha (IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil) J Juliana AROXA PEREIRA Barbosa (IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil) G Giselle MARIA Vignal (IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil) A ANA PAULA MARTINS Sebastiao (IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil) C Caio DE CARVALHO Santos (IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil) B Bianca NASCIMENTO DE AQUINO Garibaldi (IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil) F Fernando AUGUSTO Soares (IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil) J José Bines R Renata Colombo Bonadio (Instituto D’Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil)

Abstract

e12593 Background: The Ki-67 index and histologic grade are key pathological features guiding systemic treatment decisions in Breast Cancer (BC). Variability between core biopsy and surgical specimens may impact management, including decisions regarding omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy. We evaluated the concordance of Ki-67 and histologic grade between biopsy and surgical specimens and quantified clinically meaningful Ki-67 differences. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of BC patients with paired biopsy and surgical pathology specimens treated between 2023 and 2025 in a single oncology network in Brazil. Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Ki-67 concordance was assessed using a 20% cutoff ( < 20% vs ≥20%) and by absolute differences > 10% between specimens. Concordance was evaluated using cross-tabulations and Fisher's exact tests. Surgical specimen grade was used as the reference for grade-specific Ki-67 analyses. Results: A total of 275 paired specimens were analyzed. Ki-67 ≥ 20% was observed in 49.1% of biopsy specimens and 54.2% of surgical specimens. In biopsy samples, 33.0% were grade 1, 53.3% grade 2, and 13.7% grade 3, compared with 23.6%, 58.2% and 18.2%, respectively, in surgical specimens. Median Ki-67 in biopsy samples was 12% (IQR 6-19%) for grade 1, 19% (IQR 10-30%) for grade 2, and 60% (IQR 30-70%) for grade 3. In surgical specimens, median Ki-67 was 12% (IQR 8-15%), 20% (IQR 13-29%), and 50% (IQR 25-60%), respectively. Overall, 25.1% of patients showed a Ki-67 difference > 10% bteween biopsy and surgery, including 10.9% with decrease and 14.2% with an increase in the surgical specimen. Ki-67 variation was most frequent in grade 3 tumors (20% decrease > 10%; 16% increase > 10%), but was also observed in grade 2 (8.8% decrease; 16.9% increase) and grade 1 tumors (9.2% decrease; 6.2% increase). Significant discordance was also observed for histologic grade (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Substantial variability in Ki-67 index and histologic grade exists between biopsy and surgical specimens, Approximately one third os cases crossed the 20% Ki-67 thershold, and histologic grade was upgraded to grade 3 in 13%. These findings highlight the limitations of relying solely on biopsy pathology for systemic treatment decisions, particularly in hormone receptor-positive disease, where Ki-67 and grade may influence adjuvant treatment considerations, including eligibility for CDK4/6 inhibitors and decisions regarding omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Routine reassessment of postoperative pathology may optimize treatment decision-making Surgery Ki-67 < 20% Surgery Ki-67 ≥ 20% p value Biopsy Ki-67 < 20% 98 (70.0%) 42 (30.0%) < 0.001 Biopsy Ki-67 ≥ 20% 28 (20.7%) 107 (79.3%) Surgery G1 Surgery G2 Surgery G3 Biopsy G1 53 (59.6%) 35 (39.3%) 1 (1.1%) < 0.001 Biopsy G2 10 (6.9%) 117 (81.3%) 17 (11.8%) Biopsy G3 1 (2.7%) 5 (13.5%) 31 (83.8%)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (11)

L

Luiz Gustavo Torres

IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil

G

Gerusa BIAGIONE Tiburzio

IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil

R

Ruana MOURA Rocha

IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil

J

Juliana AROXA PEREIRA Barbosa

IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil

G

Giselle MARIA Vignal

IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil

A

ANA PAULA MARTINS Sebastiao

IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil

C

Caio DE CARVALHO Santos

IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil

B

Bianca NASCIMENTO DE AQUINO Garibaldi

IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil

F

Fernando AUGUSTO Soares

IDOR - Instituto Dor de Ensino e Pesquisa, Sao Paulo, Brazil

J

José Bines

R

Renata Colombo Bonadio

Instituto D’Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil