Computational pathology to predict docetaxel benefit for high-risk localized prostate cancer in NRG/RTOG 0521 (NCT00288080).

S Sebastian R. Medina (Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University, Atlanta, GA) N Naoto Tokuyama (Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University, Atlanta, GA) K Kamal Hammouda (Emory University, Atlanta, GA) T Tilak Pathak T Tuomas Mirtti (Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland) P Pingfu Fu (6Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States) S Shilpa Gupta (Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA) P Priti Lal (Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) H Howard M. Sandler (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA) R Rohann Jonathan Mark Correa (London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada) S Susan Chafe (Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada) A Amit I. Shah (WellSpan Health, York, PA) J Jason A. Efstathiou (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA) K Karen E. Hoffman (Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) M Michael Wayne Straza (Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI) M Mark A. Hallman (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) R Richard C. Jordan (NRG Oncology Biospecimen Bank, San Francisco, CA) S Stephanie L. Pugh (NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA) F Felix Y. Feng A Anant Madabhushi

Abstract

1557 Background: The benefit of adding docetaxel (DTX) to standard of care (SOC) for high-risk localized prostate cancer remains debated. The NRG/RTOG 0521 randomized phase III trial demonstrated that docetaxel, when added to SOC—comprising radiotherapy (RT) and long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)—improved overall survival (OS). However, while RTOG 0521 demonstrated improved OS with DTX, the observed improvement did not meet the predetermined threshold for clinical significance, leaving the role of DTX intensification uncertain. Enhanced stratification methods are needed to identify aggressive disease phenotypes and guide patient selection for adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to develop and validate a computational AI derived pathology image classifier (APIC) to quantify the tumor-immune microenvironment from diagnostic biopsy specimens and predict DTX benefit in patients from the NRG/RTOG 0521 trial. Methods: The study included patients with available high-quality biopsy images from the NRG/RTOG 0521 trial. Primary outcome was OS, median follow-up was 5.7 years. After segmenting nuclei and identifying lymphocytes, we derived features that captured immune-tumor spatial patterns and nuclear diversity in the tumor microenvironment to construct APIC. DTX benefit was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models with interaction terms, log-rank tests and Kaplan-Meier analyses by comparing OS between treatment arms within APIC-stratified groups. Results: Among NRG/RTOG 0521 trial participants, 350 patients had evaluable quality biopsy slide images. Half of the SOC (RT+ADT) arm was used for training (84 patients), and 266 patients were used for validation (SOC: 85 patients, and SOC+DTX arm: 181 patients). DTX significantly improved OS in APIC-positive (n = 119, 45%) patients (HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26-0.92, p = 0.023) but not in APIC-negative (n = 147, 55%) patients (HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 0.59-2.3, p = 0.66). APIC-positive patients derived 22% 10-year OS benefit (95% CI: 1.7%-41.6%) from DTX. The 10-year OS was 74% in the DTX arm compared to 52% with RT and ADT alone in the APIC-positive group. A significant interaction (p = 0.024) was observed between APIC status and treatment. Conclusions: We validated APIC as a predictive biomarker for DTX benefit in high-risk localized prostate cancer patients from NRG/RTOG 0521, identifying a subset who achieved significant survival improvement from treatment intensification – a benefit not reached in the unselected trial population. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate APIC's predictive potential of DTX intensification in metastatic disease settings.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 1557-1557
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

S

Sebastian R. Medina

Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University, Atlanta, GA

N

Naoto Tokuyama

Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University, Atlanta, GA

K

Kamal Hammouda

Emory University, Atlanta, GA

T

Tilak Pathak

T

Tuomas Mirtti

Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

P

Pingfu Fu

6Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States

S

Shilpa Gupta

Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA

P

Priti Lal

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

H

Howard M. Sandler

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

R

Rohann Jonathan Mark Correa

London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada

S

Susan Chafe

Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada

A

Amit I. Shah

WellSpan Health, York, PA

J

Jason A. Efstathiou

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

K

Karen E. Hoffman

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

M

Michael Wayne Straza

Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

M

Mark A. Hallman

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

R

Richard C. Jordan

NRG Oncology Biospecimen Bank, San Francisco, CA

S

Stephanie L. Pugh

NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA

F

Felix Y. Feng

A

Anant Madabhushi