Comprehensive molecular and immunohistochemical profiling of endometrial carcinomas: Insights into subtype-specific characteristics.

S Shriniwas Subhash Kulkarni (Sahyadri Hospital, Pune, India) S Sabhyata Gupta (Medanta, The Medicity, Gurugram, India) A Ashok K. Vaid (Medanta, The Medicity, Gurugram, India) P Pritam Kataria (Sir H. N. Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India) S Satya Pal Kataria (Medanta, The Medicity, Gurugram, India) R Roopesh Narayanachary (Sparsh Hospital, Banglore, India) A Amish Vora (Hope Oncology Clinic, Delhi, India) A Anantbhushan Ranade (Avinash Cancer Clinic, Pune, India) A Amit Dilip Bhatt (Avinash Cancer Clinic, Pune, India) A Atreyee Saha (Institute of Physiological Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry University of Münster Münster Germany) S Sewanti Atul Limaye (Medical & Precision Oncology, Clinical and Translational Oncology Research, Sir HN Reliance Foundation, Mumbai, India) S Shivam Shingla (S.L. Raheja, Mumbai, India) D Darshana Patil (Datar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, India) H Harshal Darokar (Datar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, India) R Rajan Datar (Datar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, India) R Rajeev Vijayakumar (Gleneagles BGS Hospital, Bangalore, India)

Abstract

e17641 Background: Endometrial carcinomas exhibit significant molecular and histopathological heterogeneity. This study analyzes 171 samples to uncover subtype-specific alterations and potential therapeutic targets. Methods: The samples included endometrioid (N=96), serous (N=30), and other histological subtypes. Molecular profiling, performed using a semiconductor-based NGS platform at Datar Cancer Genetics, assessed mutations, amplifications, and fusions in key cancer genes. Tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), and PD-L1 expression were evaluated in a subset. Results: The most frequently mutated genes in the cohort were PTEN (41%) and TP53 (41%). Subtype analysis revealed distinct patterns: PTEN mutations were more prevalent in endometrioid tumors (52%) than in serous tumors (10%), while TP53 mutations dominated serous tumors (80%) compared to endometrioid tumors (25%). Other commonly mutated genes in endometrioid and serous subtypes included PIK3CA (33.3% vs 30%), KRAS (18.8% vs 13.3%). CTNNB1 had notable enrichment in endometrioid tumors (19.8%) as against serous (6.7%). Additional alterations in ARID1A , PIK3R1 , and FBXW7 were observed, with subtype-specific distributions indicating diverse oncogenic drivers. POLE mutations seen in 4.9% (7/143) identify hypermutated tumors with high immunogenic potential. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was observed in 25.2% of tumors (29/115). PDL1 expression positivity in 15.6%, (7/45) highlight subgroups potentially responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. TMB-High status was seen in 28.9% of cases (13/45). ER positivity (74.1%, 60/81) aligned with the hormonal dependency of many endometrioid carcinomas, while HER2 overexpression was detected in 13%. Tumor differentiation grades in the cohort (N=104) were 24% well-differentiated, 13.5% moderately differentiated, and 61.5% poorly differentiated. Poorly differentiated tumors, predominantly serous, showed high TP53 mutations and aggressive behavior. Well-differentiated tumors, mainly endometrioid, were enriched for PTEN and CTNNB1 mutations. Endometrioid tumors demonstrated frequent alterations in the PI3K / AKT signalling pathway, with mutations in PTEN , PIK3CA , and PIK3R1 collectively observed in a significant proportion of cases. Additionally, mutations in CTNNB1 and KRAS were more prevalent, indicating the involvement of Wnt/β-catenin and RAS signalling pathways in tumorigenesis. In contrast, serous tumors were predominantly driven by TP53 mutations and exhibited recurrent alterations in FBXW7 and PIK3CA , suggesting distinct oncogenic pathways. Conclusions: This analysis highlights the molecular and phenotypic diversity of endometrial carcinomas, emphasizing the need for routine molecular profiling beyond POLE , TP53 and MSI to enable personalized therapies.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

S

Shriniwas Subhash Kulkarni

Sahyadri Hospital, Pune, India

S

Sabhyata Gupta

Medanta, The Medicity, Gurugram, India

A

Ashok K. Vaid

Medanta, The Medicity, Gurugram, India

P

Pritam Kataria

Sir H. N. Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India

S

Satya Pal Kataria

Medanta, The Medicity, Gurugram, India

R

Roopesh Narayanachary

Sparsh Hospital, Banglore, India

A

Amish Vora

Hope Oncology Clinic, Delhi, India

A

Anantbhushan Ranade

Avinash Cancer Clinic, Pune, India

A

Amit Dilip Bhatt

Avinash Cancer Clinic, Pune, India

A

Atreyee Saha

Institute of Physiological Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry University of Münster Münster Germany

S

Sewanti Atul Limaye

Medical & Precision Oncology, Clinical and Translational Oncology Research, Sir HN Reliance Foundation, Mumbai, India

S

Shivam Shingla

S.L. Raheja, Mumbai, India

D

Darshana Patil

Datar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, India

H

Harshal Darokar

Datar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, India

R

Rajan Datar

Datar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, India

R

Rajeev Vijayakumar

Gleneagles BGS Hospital, Bangalore, India