Comprehensive decision support tool (DST) in breast cancer: Automated National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines linked to living systematic literature review (SLR).
Abstract
e13676 Background: An SLR of interventional clinical trials projects > 7,500 publications in 2024, alongside > 6 NCCN updates and numerous FDA approvals. For oncologists with demanding schedules, staying updated is a challenge. A clinical data system integrating automated NCCN treatment paradigm with a real-time SLR, FDA approvals, and ongoing trials can support evidence-based decisions. This study leveraged AI and automation to create a comprehensive DST for breast cancer (BC). Methods: A Cochrane-compliant SLR protocol was automated for daily updates. A Large Language Model trained on > 20,000 annotated clinical trial records (across six cancer types, including BC) extracted 32 variables per publication (e.g., TNM staging, histology, biomarker, risk factors, treatment line, interventions, interventions; randomization, study phase and sample size; analysis type, follow-up period; reported outcomes (median and landmark overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and other progression measures, response data, quality of life); subgroup analyses, safety/toxicity). Extracted data were standardized and integrated with established guidelines treatment paradigm. A software tool was built to filter this database, linking treatment pathways to real-time SLR, FDA approvals, and ongoing clinical trials. Results: The real-time SLR identified 317 interventional BC trial publications in 2024. In a test-case query for treatments in HER2-negative metastatic BC patients progressing after CDK4/6 inhibitors, 89 relevant publications were identified in < 1 minute. Of these, 24 focused on post-CDK 4/6 progression with 10 reporting on 8 Phase 2 or 3 RCTs of targeted therapies, antibody-drug conjugates, CDK4/6 inhibitors, and chemotherapy (3, 2, 2, and 1 studies, respectively). Five studies showed significant PFS improvement vs. comparators, of which four were included in NCCN guidelines. Traditional SLR would require 3 weeks and multiple researchers to achieve similar results. Conclusions: By selecting key patient criteria (e.g., biomarkers, metastatic stage, treatment path), our Decision Support System links real-time clinical data to established guidelines. Implementation in clinical practice could enable oncologists to make timely, informed decisions, potentially improving patient outcomes.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (5)
Peter A. Kaufman
Anna Forsythe
Oncoscope-AI LLC, Miami, FL
Rozee Liu
Oncoscope AI LLC, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Jessicca Martin Rege
Oncoscope-AI LLC, Miami, FL
Javier Cortés
International Breast Cancer Center, Pangaea Oncology, Quiron Group, Barcelona