Comprehensive clinical analysis of cervical clear cell adenocarcinoma: A real-world multicenter study.

Y Yingjie Hu Q QiJun Wu (Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China) X Xiaolin Meng (Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) H Hao Wen J Jie Yang J Jianan Sun Y Yingli Zhang Y Yifan Meng (College of Chemistry, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Chemical Power Sources, Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (Ministry of Education), Renewable Energy Conversion and Storage Centre, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Biosensing and Molecular Recognition, Frontiers Science Centre for New Organic Matter) Y Yanzhou Wang P Peng Peng T Ting-Ting Gong (Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China) K Kezhen Li (Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China)

Abstract

e17525 Background: Cervical clear cell adenocarcinoma (CCAC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy for which evidence-based management strategies are lacking. This study aimed to characterize the real-world clinicopathological features, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with CCAC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 553 patients diagnosed with CCAC between 1993 and 2024 across 26 tertiary hospitals in China. Clinicopathological features, therapeutic approaches, and survival outcomes were assessed. Patients were categorized according to the 2018 FIGO staging system into early-stage (IA1–IB2, IIA1), locally advanced (IB3, IIA2–IIB), lymph node metastasis (IIIC), and advanced-stage disease (IIIA, IIIB, and IV). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) at 5 years. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-regression models. Results: A total of 553 patients were included, with a median age of 50 years (IQR, 39–58). Patients were often diagnosed at an early-stage (54.4%), with 5-year OS rates exceeding 90% and declining progressively with stage. Surgery was identified as an independent favorable prognostic factor (HR 0.34 [95% CI 0.12-0.95]). Among patients with early-stage disease, low-risk patients achieved favorable outcomes with surgery alone, whereas intermediate-risk patients demonstrated improved OS with adjuvant chemotherapy. In non–early-stage disease, combined treatment with surgery and radiotherapy was associated with the best survival outcomes in locally advanced and node-positive subgroups. Vaginal bleeding was the most common presenting symptom (83.9%). Regarding initial diagnostic evaluation, imaging showed the highest abnormality detection rate (82.2%), outperforming cytology (54.8%) and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing (17.9%). Conclusions: This study provides an up-to-date overview of CCAC, highlighting that surgery plays a central role in its management and the importance of individualized adjuvant therapies. In early-stage disease, surgery alone is appropriate for low-risk patients, whereas adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered for those at intermediate risk. In non–early-stage disease, incorporating surgery into multimodal treatment with (chemo)radiotherapy is associated with superior survival compared with non-surgical or surgery-alone approaches. The low detection rates of HPV and cytology testing underscore the limitations of standard cervical screening in CCAC and emphasize the critical role of clinical evaluation and imaging in symptomatic patients.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

Y

Yingjie Hu

Q

QiJun Wu

Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China

X

Xiaolin Meng

Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

H

Hao Wen

J

Jie Yang

J

Jianan Sun

Y

Yingli Zhang

Y

Yifan Meng

College of Chemistry, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Chemical Power Sources, Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (Ministry of Education), Renewable Energy Conversion and Storage Centre, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Biosensing and Molecular Recognition, Frontiers Science Centre for New Organic Matter

Y

Yanzhou Wang

P

Peng Peng

T

Ting-Ting Gong

Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China

K

Kezhen Li

Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China