Competition between One‐ and Two‐Electron Unimolecular Reactions of Late 3d‐Metal Complexes [(Me<sub>3</sub>SiCH<sub>2</sub>)<i><sub>n</sub></i>M]<sup>–</sup>(M = Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu; <i>n</i> = 2–4)

T Torben Kühl (Institut für Organische und Biomolekulare Chemie Universität Göttingen Tammannstraße 2 Göttingen 37077 Germany) L Lisa Hetzel (TUM School of Natural Sciences and Catalysis Research Center Department of Chemistry Technical University of Munich Lichtenbergstraße 4 Garching 85748 Germany) C Christopher J. Stein (Department Chemie and Catalysis Research Center (CRC), School of Natural Sciences) K Konrad Koszinowski (Institut für Organische und Biomolekulare Chemie Universität Göttingen Tammannstraße 2 Göttingen 37077 Germany)

Abstract

AbstractAlthough organometallic complexes of the late 3d elements are known to undergo both one‐and two‐electron reactions, their relative propensities to do so remain poorly understood. To gain direct insight into the competition between these different pathways, we have analyzed the unimolecular gas‐phase reactivity of a series of well‐defined model complexes [(Me3SiCH2)nM]− (M = Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu; n = 2–4). Applying a combination of tandem‐mass spectrometry, quantum‐chemical computations, and statistical rate‐theory calculations, we find several different fragmentation reactions, among which the homolytic cleavage of metal‐carbon bonds and radical dissociations are particularly prominent. In all cases, these one‐electron reactions are entropically favored. For the ferrate and cobaltate complexes, they are also energetically preferred, which explains their predominance in the corresponding fragmentation experiments. For [(Me3SiCH2)4Ni]− and, even more so, for [(Me3SiCH2)4Cu]−, a concerted reductive elimination as a prototypical two‐electron reaction is energetically more favorable and gains in importance. [(Me3SiCH2)3Ni]− is special in that it has two nearly degenerate spin states, both of which react in different ways. A simple thermochemical analysis shows that the relative order of the first and second bond‐dissociation energies is of key importance in controlling the competition between radical dissociations and concerted reductive eliminations.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 64, Issue 21
Published May 19, 2025
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (4)

T

Torben Kühl

Institut für Organische und Biomolekulare Chemie Universität Göttingen Tammannstraße 2 Göttingen 37077 Germany

L

Lisa Hetzel

TUM School of Natural Sciences and Catalysis Research Center Department of Chemistry Technical University of Munich Lichtenbergstraße 4 Garching 85748 Germany

C

Christopher J. Stein

Department Chemie and Catalysis Research Center (CRC), School of Natural Sciences

K

Konrad Koszinowski

Institut für Organische und Biomolekulare Chemie Universität Göttingen Tammannstraße 2 Göttingen 37077 Germany