Comparison of WHO laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based CVD risk charts among hypertensive adults attending primary healthcare centers in West Africa sub-region

K Kojo Awotwi Hutton-Mensah O Olayinka Rasheed Ibrahim A Adaku Nwankwo G George Bediako Nketiah F Funmi Temidayo Adeniyi A Abukari Yakubu Natogmah J James Ayodele Ogunmodede D Dike Ojji O Olumide Adesola B Biodun Sulyman Alabi O Olugbenga Ayodeji Mokuolu D Daniel Sarpong

Abstract

Background The World Health Organization (WHO) non-laboratory cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk chart is sub-region-specific and is advocated in resource-constrained settings. However, the extent of agreement with laboratory-based assessment among hypertensive adults attending primary health centers (PHCs) in the West Africa sub-region remains unknown. This study compared 10-year CVD risk among adults with hypertension attending PHCs in Ghana and Nigeria. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study recruited 319 adults with hypertension at PHCs in Ghana and Nigeria. All participants had their blood pressure, anthropometrics, fasting blood sugar, and fasting cholesterol measured following standard procedures. WHO laboratory and non-laboratory CVD risks were assessed and compared using Kappa statistics, correlation, and Bland-Altman Plot, Results The median (interquartile range) for laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based CVD risk scores were comparable [7.0 (4.0 11.0) vs. 7.0 (4.0 to 11.0), p = 0.914]. Of the 319 participants, laboratory-based assessment classified 214 (67.1%) as low risk, while 210 (65.8%) were classified as low risk using the non-laboratory method. Eleven (3.4%) and 14 (4.4%) participants were classified as high-risk using laboratory- and non-laboratory-based methods, respectively. Overall, there was a very good positive correlation between the CVD risk assessment methods (r = 0.948, p<0.001). For all participants combined, there was substantial agreement (Kappa statistics), with K = 0.766. Bland-Altman showed a mean bias of 0.15 (SD = 1.74) in favor of non-laboratory-based assessment of CVD with an upper limit of 3.57 and a lower limit of –3.26. Conclusion There was substantial agreement between laboratory- and non-laboratory-based WHO CVD risk charts in this study. In low-resource settings, such as Ghana and Nigeria, the WHO non-laboratory CVD risk prediction model offers a huge opportunity for primary CVD prevention in adults with hypertension.

Article Details

Journal PLoS ONE
Volume / Issue Vol. 20, Issue 6
Published June 09, 2025
Pages e0317640
ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science

Journal Info

PLoS ONE

Public Library of Science

ISSN: 1932-6203 Open Access Health Sciences

Authors (12)

K

Kojo Awotwi Hutton-Mensah

O

Olayinka Rasheed Ibrahim

A

Adaku Nwankwo

G

George Bediako Nketiah

F

Funmi Temidayo Adeniyi

A

Abukari Yakubu Natogmah

J

James Ayodele Ogunmodede

D

Dike Ojji

O

Olumide Adesola

B

Biodun Sulyman Alabi

O

Olugbenga Ayodeji Mokuolu

D

Daniel Sarpong