Comparison of two electroacupuncture regimens on symptoms and brain structures in breast cancer survivors: A randomized, controlled trial.

A Alexandre Chan (Department of Clinical Pharmacy Practice University of California Irvine California USA) O Olivia Grace Georgina Drayson (University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA) D Ding Quan Ng (2Section of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT) M Matthew Heshmatipour J Julia Trudeau (University of California Irvine School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irvine, CA) S Sayeh Moazami Lavasani (University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA) R Ritesh Parajuli (University of California Irvine Division of Hematology and Oncology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Irvine, CA) S Sanghoon Lee L Lifang Xie (Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, IRDR International Center of Excellence on Risk Interconnectivity and Governance on Weather, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering) M Munjal Acharya (University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA) C Charles Limoli (University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA) S Shaista Malik (University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States)

Abstract

12119 Background: Although electroacupuncture (EA) has shown usefulness in managing neuropsychiatric symptoms in cancer survivors, a specific acupoint regimen has not been established. We conducted a randomized, controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded pilot trial to compare two EA regimens on neuropsychiatric symptoms and associated brain structural changes in breast cancer survivors. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05283577). Methods: Breast cancer survivors who self-reported cognitive impairment, fatigue, insomnia, or psychological distress were randomized (1:1) to receive ten weekly therapeutic EA to target either neuropsychiatric-specific (nEA) or non-neuropsychiatric-specific (sham EA, sEA) acupoints. Outcomes were assessed using patient-reported outcomes (EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-Cog, MFSI-SF), neurocognitive tests (CANTAB), and neuroimaging (measuring gray matter, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid, diffusion tensor metrics, and volume and mean intensity of the hippocampus) before and after treatment. We computed group-specific treatment effect sizes (Glass's Δ) adjusted for baseline variability using linear mixed models. A Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed between the neurocognitive scores and the imaging metrics. Multiple testing was controlled via the Benjamini-Hochberg method, with statistical significance set at P-adjusted < 0.05. Adverse events (AEs) were graded with CTCAE v5. Results: Thirty-five participants were recruited, of which five dropped out, leaving 30 (86%) completing all treatment sessions. The average (±SD) age was 58.2 ±12.2 years, with 66% non-Hispanic White, 77% holding a Bachelor’s degree or higher, 94% received systemic treatment and/or radiotherapy for cancer, 86% reporting ≥2 neuropsychiatric symptoms. Both groups showed statistically significant pre-post medium-to-large effect sizes in perceived cognitive function, fatigue, and quality of life. nEA group observed significant improvement in cognitive domains of attention (ES=0.708, P-adjusted=0.004), memory (ES=0.488, P-adjusted=0.026), and emotional functioning (ES=0.664, P-adjusted=0.004). Neuroimages showed greater gray matter volume change (P=0.0327) and post-treatment hippocampus mean intensity (P=0.0468) in nEA versus sEA. In the nEA group, correlations were observed between attention and gray matter volume (P=0.0198) and between executive function and hippocampus volume (P=0.0204). All AEs were grade 2 or lower: nEA participants reported pain (n=1) and bleeding (n=1), while sEA participants reported numbness (n=2), bruising (n=1), nausea (n=1), and redness (n=1). Conclusions: Ten weeks of electroacupuncture targeting neuropsychiatric-related acupoints, compared to sham acupoints, improves neuropsychiatric symptoms in breast cancer survivors, supported by clinically relevant structural brain changes. Clinical trial information: NCT05283577 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 12119-12119
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

A

Alexandre Chan

Department of Clinical Pharmacy Practice University of California Irvine California USA

O

Olivia Grace Georgina Drayson

University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA

D

Ding Quan Ng

2Section of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT

M

Matthew Heshmatipour

J

Julia Trudeau

University of California Irvine School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irvine, CA

S

Sayeh Moazami Lavasani

University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA

R

Ritesh Parajuli

University of California Irvine Division of Hematology and Oncology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Irvine, CA

S

Sanghoon Lee

L

Lifang Xie

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, IRDR International Center of Excellence on Risk Interconnectivity and Governance on Weather, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering

M

Munjal Acharya

University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA

C

Charles Limoli

University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA

S

Shaista Malik

University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, United States