Comparing RECIST, Choi, modified Choi (mChoi) and viable tumor volume (VTV) in predicting clinical benefit of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFRi) in patients (pts) with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC).

M Michael Wotman (Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) R Richard Dagher (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) C Camilla Oliveira Hoff (University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil) A Ahmed Msherghi (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) F Flavia Bonini (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) E Ethan B. Ludmir (Noah S. Meimoun, BA, Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alexander D. Sherry, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ethan B. Ludmir, MD, Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Timothy A. Lin, MD, MBA, Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) M Max Wintermark (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) R Renata Ferrarotto

Abstract

e18145 Background: RECIST may underestimate the clinical activity of systemic therapies for ACC, especially in pts with ACC-II molecular subtype receiving VEGFRi, which can cause tumor necrosis without significant tumor shrinkage. Choi and mChoi, which consider size and density (attenuation), and VTV, which incorporates volume and density, may be better indicators of VEGFRi efficacy. Methods: Retrospective study conducted at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Pts with the following criteria were included: 1) biopsy-proven R/M ACC, 2) received at least one cycle (28 days) of lenvatinib or axitinib monotherapy in any line of treatment, 3) available baseline and at least one re-staging scan. Best overall response (BOR) (partial response [PR], stable disease [SD], and progressive disease [PD]) was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1, Choi, mChoi, and VTV. Time to next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) according to BOR were compared for each of the four response criteria using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 50 R/M ACC pts treated with lenvatinib or axitinib, 27 had available scans for analysis. Median age at VEGFRi initiation was 53.2 years. 70.4% were female, 81.5% had head and neck salivary gland primary tumors, and 77.8% received lenvatinib. Among 21 pts with known histology and 22 pts with molecular profiling, 81% had either non-solid or mixed solid/non-solid histology, and 72.7% were NOTCH wild-type, respectively. BOR according to the four response criteria were as follows: RECIST: 0 PR, 21 SD, 5 PD; Choi: 17 PR, 4 SD, 5 PD; mChoi: 5 PR, 16 SD, 5 PD; VTV: 5 PR, 15 SD, 5 PD. Median TTNT for the total cohort was 13.3 months. There was a significant difference in TTNT according to RECIST BOR (median TTNT was 17.6 months for SD and 8.3 months for PD, p =.010), Choi BOR (median TTNT was 24 months for PR, 7.2 months for SD, and 8.3 months for PD, p =.005) and mChoi BOR (median TTNT was 5.4 months for PR, 17.6 months for SD, and 8.3 months for PD, p =.028), but not according to VTV BOR. Median OS from VEGFRi initiation for the total cohort was 22.3 months. There was a significant difference in OS according to mChoi BOR (median OS was 14.2 months for PR, 39.6 months for SD, and 16.8 months for PD, p =.002), but not according to BOR for any of the other response criteria. Conclusions: Although RECIST was associated with TTNT,Choi was better able to identify responders with the longest real-world clinical benefit from VEGFRi. However, Choi was not predictive of treatment outcome among non-responders (SD or PD). Patients with SD per mChoi had the longest survival, but this may be related to confounding from ACC molecular subtype or other factors.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (8)

M

Michael Wotman

Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

R

Richard Dagher

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

C

Camilla Oliveira Hoff

University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

A

Ahmed Msherghi

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

F

Flavia Bonini

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

E

Ethan B. Ludmir

Noah S. Meimoun, BA, Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Alexander D. Sherry, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Ethan B. Ludmir, MD, Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Timothy A. Lin, MD, MBA, Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

M

Max Wintermark

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

R

Renata Ferrarotto