Comparing first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.
Abstract
578 Background: Liver metastasis is a common manifestation of advanced malignancy. In recent years, novel therapeutic strategies, particularly combination regimens involving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs), have emerged for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, direct head-to-head comparisons of the first-line ICPIs are limited. To evaluate their clinical impact, we conducted a meta-analysis assessing the efficacy and safety of all Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved first-line ICPIs in patients with advanced or metastatic HCC. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2018 to 2025. Eligible studies included randomized clinical trials evaluating FDA- approved ICPIs as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic HCC. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. For studies presenting Kaplan-Meier survival curves, individual patient data (IPD) reconstruction tools were used to extract outcome data. Results: A total of 1,064 patients with Unresectable or metastatic HCC from STRIDE, IMbrave150, and CheckMate 9DW were included, with a median age of 64-65 years and 81-83% being male across the three treatment groups: Tremelimumab + Durvalumab (Durva/Treme, n=393), Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev, n=336), and Nivolumab + Ipilimumab (Nivo/Ipi, n=335). The meta-analysis showed that median OS was highest with Nivo/Ipi (24 months), followed by Atezo/Bev (19 months) and Durva/Treme (16.7 months) (p=0.046), while median PFS was 9.3, 6.8, and 3.8 months, respectively (p<0.001). Grade 3/4 adverse events were lowest with Durva/Treme (25.5%) compared with Atezo/Bev (42.6%) and Nivo/Ipi (40.9%) (p<0.0001). Fatigue and diarrhea were slightly more frequent with Durva/Treme, whereas hypertension was most common with Atezo/Bev; other toxicities were comparable across groups. Conclusions: First-line ICPIs combination for advanced HCC shows distinct profiles: Nivo/Ipi offers the longest survival, Durva/Treme has the lowest severe toxicity. These findings suggest that first-line ICPIs selection in advanced HCC should balance efficacy and safety, supporting individualized treatment decisions.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (6)
Ebtesam Al-Najjar
Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Nour Maher Mustafa
Jordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan
Abdullah Esmail
Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Yazan Hamadneh
Jordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan
Bayan Khasawneh
3Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, United States
Maen Abdelrahim
Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center, Houston, TX