Comparative survival outcomes among histological subtypes of pulmonary adenocarcinoma: A nationwide study.

N Nouman Aziz (6Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, United States) W Waseem Nabi (5University Florida, Gainsville, United States) M Muzamil Khan (The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States) S Sukhrob Makhkamov (Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO) A Anees Cheema (Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY) N Nadia Akbar (Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY) A Ali Usama (Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States) A Ahmad Basharat (1Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, United States) E Erika LaBelle (Rocky Vista University LLC, Parker, CO) H Haseeb Tareen (1Henry Ford Hospital, Jackson, United States) A Adnan Bhat (University of Florida, Gainesville, FL) M Mir Wajid Majeed (Government Medical College Srinagar, Srinagar, India) M Muhammad Mudassar R Rana Uzair Ahmad (8Trinity Health Livonia, Michigan, Livonia, United States) M Muhammad Jawad Javed (Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY) J Junaid Anwar (3MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER, Houston, United States) U Usman Ilyas (1Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, United States) M Muhammad Salman Faisal (1University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, United States) M Moazzam Shahzad (10H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States)

Abstract

e20066 Background: Adenocarcinoma of the lung is a heterogeneous malignancy with multiple histological subtypes. In the US, population survival outcomes across these subtypes remain underexplored. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with various Lung Adenocarcinomas (Acinar, Lepidic, Papillary, Solid & solid type, Invasive mucinous, Mixed mucinous/non-mucinous, Colloid, Fetal, and Enteric type), diagnosed between 2010 and 2017, was conducted using the National Cancer Database in accordance with STROBE guidelines. Unadjusted median overall survival (mOS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was performed using accelerated failure time model to estimate covariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HR). Covariates included age, sex, race, tumor grade, TNM stage, Charlson Comorbidity Index, insurance status, year of diagnosis, facility type, and treatment modality. Lepidic carcinoma served as the reference arm for HR calculations. Results: A total of 46,218 patients were included in this large cohort study. 39,865 patients (86.3%) were white, 27,094 (58.6%) were female, 31,827 (69%) were aged ≥65 years, 29,843 (64.57%) had Medicare insurance, and 18,788 (40.65%) were treated in academic or research institutions. For unadjusted mOS, Acinar adenocarcinoma (n=15,877; 34.35%) demonstrated the best outcomes (mOS: 97.84 months, p<0.05). After covariate adjustment, Solid adenocarcinoma (n=1,736; 3.76%) had the most favorable prognosis (HR = 0.85, p<0.01). In contrast, Enteric type adenocarcinoma (n=33; 0.07%) exhibited the poorest survival, with an mOS of only 27.24 months (HR = 1.63, p<0.05). Lepidic adenocarcinoma (n=8,923; 19.31%), the reference group, demonstrated an mOS of 73.03 months with HR of 1. Other subtypes, such as Mixed/non mucinous adenocarcinoma (n=195; 0.42%; mOS: 85.22 months, HR = 0.91, p = 0.377) and Papillary adenocarcinoma (n=6,094; 13.19%; mOS: 64.79 months, HR = 0.97, p = 0.236), showed intermediate survival, with no statistically significant differences. On the other hand, significant differences were observed for Fetal adenocarcinoma (n=46; 0.10%; mOS: 39.82 months, HR = 1.17, p = 0.467), Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (n=1,254; 2.71%; mOS: 51.81 months, HR = 1.17, p<0.01), and Colloid adenocarcinoma (n=12,060; 26.09%; mOS: 44.09 months, HR = 1.29, p<0.01). Conclusions: This study highlights marked differences in survival across lung adenocarcinoma subtypes. These results stress the importance of further research to develop therapies tailored to specific histological variants. Adenocarcinoma subtype HR CI P value Lepidic ref Acinar 0.90 0.86–0.94 <0.01 Solid 0.85 0.78–0.92 <0.01 Enteric type 1.63 1.05–2.53 <0.05 Mixed/non mucinous 0.91 0.75–1.11 0.37 Papillary 0.97 0.93–1.02 0.23 Fetal 1.17 0.78–1.74 0.46 Invasive mucinous 1.17 1.08– 1.26 <0.01 Colloid 1.29 1.24–1.34 <0.01

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

N

Nouman Aziz

6Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, United States

W

Waseem Nabi

5University Florida, Gainsville, United States

M

Muzamil Khan

The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States

S

Sukhrob Makhkamov

Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO

A

Anees Cheema

Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY

N

Nadia Akbar

Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY

A

Ali Usama

Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States

A

Ahmad Basharat

1Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, United States

E

Erika LaBelle

Rocky Vista University LLC, Parker, CO

H

Haseeb Tareen

1Henry Ford Hospital, Jackson, United States

A

Adnan Bhat

University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

M

Mir Wajid Majeed

Government Medical College Srinagar, Srinagar, India

M

Muhammad Mudassar

R

Rana Uzair Ahmad

8Trinity Health Livonia, Michigan, Livonia, United States

M

Muhammad Jawad Javed

Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY

J

Junaid Anwar

3MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER, Houston, United States

U

Usman Ilyas

1Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, United States

M

Muhammad Salman Faisal

1University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, United States

M

Moazzam Shahzad

10H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States