Comparative survival outcomes among histological subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.

W Waseem Nabi (5University Florida, Gainsville, United States) N Nouman Aziz (6Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, United States) M Mst. Khaleda Khatun (Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY) S Sukhrob Makhkamov (Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO) S Shree Rath (All India Institute of Medical Sc., Bhubaneswar, India) A Ahmad Basharat (1Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, United States) M Mohammad Arfat Ganiyani (6Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, United States) R Rohan Garje (3Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, United States) A Anees Cheema (Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY) A Ali Usama (Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States) M Mir Wajid Majeed (Government Medical College Srinagar, Srinagar, India) S Shariq Ahmad Wani (Government Medical college Srinagar, Srinagar, India) A Adnan Bhat (University of Florida, Gainesville, FL) M Muzamil Khan (The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States) M Muhammad Jawad Javed (Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY) J Junaid Anwar (3MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER, Houston, United States) Z Zeyar Thet (Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY) W Wehbeh Wehbeh (Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY) M Mir Shahnawaz (Government Medical College Srinagar, Srinagar, India) N Nelli Fromer (9Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, United States)

Abstract

e20072 Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer. However, a comparative survival impact of its histological variants remains understudied in the US population. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients diagnosed with NSCLC histological subtypes (Adenocarcinoma, Adenosquamous, Squamous, Large cell, Pseudosarcomatous, Anaplastic, Pleomorphic, Giant cell, & Spindle cell carcinomas) between 2010 and 2017. Strobe guidelines were followed for reporting purposes. Unadjusted median overall survival (mOS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. A multivariate regression analysis was conducted with an accelerated failure time model to estimate hazard ratios adjusted for covariates. Covariates included were age, sex, race, tumor grade, TNM stage, Charlson Comorbidity Index, insurance status, year of diagnosis, facility type, and treatment modality. Adenocarcinoma served as the reference arm for HR calculations. Results: A total of 708,671 patients were included in the study. Of these, 481,991 (68.01%) were aged ≥65 years, 344,131 (48.6%) were female, 608,012 (85.8%) were white, and 458,591 (64.7%) had Medicare insurance. Adenocarcinoma (n= 443,900; 62.64%) demonstrated the best outcome with mOS of 24.4 months (p<0.05), followed by Pleomorphic carcinoma (n= 1,089; 0.15%) with mOS of 16.0 months (HR = 1.14, p<0.01). Adenosquamous carcinoma (n= 12,211; 1.72%) had mOS of 19.0 months (HR = 1.18, p<0.01). Squamous cell carcinoma (n= 240,447; 33.93%) demonstrated an mOS of 17.25 months (HR = 1.23, p<0.01), while large cell carcinoma (n= 6,417; 0.91%) showed an mOS of 9.17 months (HR = 1.26, p<0.01). Of all, the worst outcomes were observed in Pseudosarcomatous carcinoma (n= 3,080; 0.43%), with a mOS of 5.98 months (HR = 1.53, p<0.01). Other histologies associated with poorer prognosis included Undifferentiated/anaplastic carcinoma (n= 399; 0.06%) with mOS of 5.98 months (HR = 1.32, p<0.01), Giant cell carcinoma (n= 395; 0.06%) with mOS of 7.16 months (HR = 1.32, p<0.01), and Spindle cell carcinoma (n= 733; 0.10%) with mOS of 6.37 months (HR = 1.35, p<0.01). Conclusions: NSCLC histological variants exhibit distinct survival outcomes, with adenocarcinoma showing the best prognosis and Pseudosarcomatous carcinoma the poorest. These results stress the importance of further research to develop therapies tailored to specific histological variants. Histology HR CI P value Adenocarcinoma ref Pleomorphic 1.14 1.06-1.22 <0.01 Adenosquamous 1.18 1.15-1.20 <0.01 Squamous cell 1.23 1.22-1.24 <0.01 Large cell 1.26 1.23-1.30 <0.01 Pseudosarcomatous 1.53 1.47-1.59 <0.01 Anaplastic 1.32 1.19-1.48 <0.01 Giant cell 1.32 1.19-1.48 <0.01 Spindle cell 1.35 1.25-1.46 <0.01

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

W

Waseem Nabi

5University Florida, Gainsville, United States

N

Nouman Aziz

6Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, United States

M

Mst. Khaleda Khatun

Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY

S

Sukhrob Makhkamov

Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO

S

Shree Rath

All India Institute of Medical Sc., Bhubaneswar, India

A

Ahmad Basharat

1Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, United States

M

Mohammad Arfat Ganiyani

6Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, United States

R

Rohan Garje

3Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, United States

A

Anees Cheema

Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY

A

Ali Usama

Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States

M

Mir Wajid Majeed

Government Medical College Srinagar, Srinagar, India

S

Shariq Ahmad Wani

Government Medical college Srinagar, Srinagar, India

A

Adnan Bhat

University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

M

Muzamil Khan

The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States

M

Muhammad Jawad Javed

Albany Medical Center Hospital, Albany, NY

J

Junaid Anwar

3MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER, Houston, United States

Z

Zeyar Thet

Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY

W

Wehbeh Wehbeh

Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY

M

Mir Shahnawaz

Government Medical College Srinagar, Srinagar, India

N

Nelli Fromer

9Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, United States