Comparative outcomes of prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory therapy.

A Ana Chachua (Albert Einstein Medical Center, Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, PA) A Alankrita Taneja (6Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia Hospital, Philadelphia, United States)

Abstract

e19542 Background: Patients with multiple myeloma have a substantially increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), further amplified among those receiving immunomodulatory drug-based (IMiD) therapy, particularly early in treatment and with other prothrombotic agents. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and low–molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) are commonly used for thromboprophylaxis, but comparative real-world outcome data remain limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Research Network of adults with multiple myeloma initiating IMiD therapy who received prophylactic anticoagulation with a DOAC (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, or dabigatran) or LMWH (dalteparin or enoxaparin) within one month of diagnosis and IMiD initiation. Patients with prior VTE were excluded. Cohorts were matched 1:1 using propensity scores. Outcomes included VTE, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding at 1 year. A lenalidomide-restricted sensitivity analysis was performed. Results: After propensity score matching, 699 patients per group were included. At 1 year, all-cause mortality occurred in 74 patients (10.6%) receiving DOACs and 117 patients (16.8%) receiving LMWH (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.44–0.79; p=0.005). There were no significant differences in VTE or major bleeding. In a lenalidomide-restricted sensitivity analysis, DOAC use remained associated with lower 1-year mortality compared with LMWH (7.7% vs 17.0%; HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29–0.61; p<0.001), among 533 patients per cohort. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of patients with multiple myeloma receiving IMiD-based therapy, DOAC prophylaxis was associated with lower 1-year all-cause mortality compared with LMWH, with no significant differences in VTE or major bleeding. These findings support further prospective studies to define optimal thromboprophylaxis strategies in this population. Outcomes at 1 year after propensity score matching (n = 699 per cohort). Outcome (1-year) DOAC (n=699) LMWH (n=699) HR (95% CI) P value All-cause mortality 10.6% 16.8% 0.59 (0.44–0.79) 0.005 Venous thromboembolism (PE or DVT) 7.5% 7.1% 1.02 (0.68–1.55) 0.55 Pulmonary embolism 3.4% 3.2% 1.01 (0.56–1.82) 0.051 Deep venous thrombosis 4.8% 5.1% 0.90 (0.57–1.51) 0.24 Major bleeding (ICH or GI bleed) 2.6% 2.5% 1.00 (0.52–1.94) 0.70 After propensity score matching incorporating age, sex, race, metastatic disease, proteasome inhibitor and systemic corticosteroid therapy, underlying comorbidities, and history of critical illness or intensive care unit admission.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (2)

A

Ana Chachua

Albert Einstein Medical Center, Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, PA

A

Alankrita Taneja

6Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia Hospital, Philadelphia, United States